Skip to main content

View Diary: The bottom line (367 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Excuse me? (none)
    While the sex angle is not the central issue here, it still is an issue.  This dude is in the WH asking the Commander-in-Chief questions during the day, and possibly soliciting sex under the guise of the military by night?

    Unless Georgie is rolling out a whole new "don't ask don't tell" policy, it's relevant.

    •  Relevant, NOT central (none)
      We're nowhere near done with this yet. He's one tool, but their spin on this means that there are more important links out there that need to be protected by exposure.
      •  That's "from exposure" (none)
        Now I'm doing it. I don't want to see any more of this guy's butt. Much rather see the corporate statements from Talon and its parent.
      •  I'm starting to believe (none)
        That Texas has WMD. All the crazy right wing shit always leads back to Texas. We gotta drain that swamp!
        •  debraz, you're right about Texas... (none)
          we do have a freaky bunch of people down here. Molly Ivins is a good source. Check out some of her stuff.

          By the way, did you know that "Brother" Bush talks on the phone for hours to his "spiritual advisor" evangelist James Robison down here? - he calls `im every few days to talk about "spiritual matters"? Didja know that? Well, pull up Robison's web site sometime, read some of his sermons, check out what this frothing-at-the-mouth-wacko is likely preachin' to our prez. I'm told it's some of the strangest, most poisonous fanatical bullshit you ever heard in yo' life. A real (genuine) Christian friend of mine told me about it - he's just horrified at Robison's rhetoric.  

          In the meantime, though, go ahead and impeach ol' Dubya - I'll help ya - but please, PLEASE, Brer Rabbit, don't send `im back to Texas! We haven't recovered from the last time he was here!

    •  let's just agree he has no creds (none)
      cause he's implicated in "homosexual evil" So when in the story did the bare picture of his upper body surfaace? After susang or before?
    •  I think the sex angle (none)
      may be the only way the American Public is ever going to be interested in this. As a writer, it bothers me because it is clearly illegal, immoral, wrong and stupid to do what "Gannon" did. But Mr. and Mrs. Moral Values are only going to care about this because he was in his undies on the Internets, posing for MEN!

      "Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer." -John F. Kennedy

      by Vestal Vespa on Wed Feb 09, 2005 at 04:04:25 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site