Skip to main content

View Diary: The bottom line (367 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  To reiterate my own point: (3.91)
    As a journalist whose beat is covering other journalists, Howard Kurtz doesn't consider having a journalist in the White House who:

    1. Operates under an assumed name

    2. Has no meaningful journalism experience whatsoever.

    3. Works directly for a GOP-linked organization that was previously denied credentials due to their partisan, non-journalistic background.

    4. Files "reports" that copy liberally from White House released text.

    5. Has background ties to military-based gay pornography/prostitution.

    6. Was given, by somebody "high-up" in the White House, classified information about the identity of an active CIA undercover operative working on WMD-related intelligence.

    ... to be a newsworthy breach of journalistic ethics, nor of White House security, national security, etc., etc., etc.  He doesn't consider any of that to be meaningfully newsworthy.  And to reiterate, Kurtz covers journalism and journalistic ethics as his primary beat.

    Think about that, everyone.  In his report, Kurtz has just given you a mountain of information on how the D.C. press operates, don't you think?  Might someone want to follow up on exploring what that means?

    •  Don't forget (none)
      possibly connected to illegal activity (prostitution)

      "Our particular principles of religion are a subject of accountability to God alone."--Thomas Jefferson

      by hopesprings on Wed Feb 09, 2005 at 04:23:27 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  that;s exactly right. (none)
      Kurtz had his chance to do the right thing.
    •  This story has so many threads... (4.00)
      so many links, so much to follow.  The headline today should be:


      Not the entire story.  Today's headline. If they had done their job, we wouldn't have been moved to do it for them.

      Blitzer is an establishment hack all the way down the line.  He wants to keep his power center in place.  Protecting his turf.  He's just as scard of Community Journalism as the administration is.  WHY.  We aren't profit driven and there are too many of us to intimidate.  If that's the case, how do they control us?

      We will peal away the onion.  Tomorrow's headline will be layer two.  Next week's will get farther into the onion.

      "Off we go into the Wild New Yonder"

      by NYBri on Wed Feb 09, 2005 at 07:59:41 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  read then learn (none)
      This is why bloggers have a bad name in the business.  read his media note column for the last two weeks and you'll see he DID cover the very same things you are accusing him of ignoring,   then go read his live online chat sessions.  The come back here and do a little research next time BEFORE you hit the reply button

      Knowledge is power Power Corrupts Study Hard Be Evil

      by Magorn on Thu Feb 10, 2005 at 09:22:40 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (135)
  • Community (62)
  • Elections (40)
  • 2016 (38)
  • Environment (36)
  • Bernie Sanders (36)
  • Hillary Clinton (31)
  • Culture (30)
  • Media (29)
  • Republicans (29)
  • Climate Change (27)
  • Education (23)
  • Spam (23)
  • Congress (23)
  • Civil Rights (22)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Barack Obama (21)
  • Labor (21)
  • Law (20)
  • Texas (20)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site