Skip to main content

View Diary: Condi Lied: Declassified Memo from Clarke (416 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Al-Qaeda's Doctrine of pre-emption (4.00)
    WH Knew A Conflict Was About To Unfold

    I believe that without an attack on NY, the Neocons were preparing for battle with Taliban--Al Qaeda and an invasion of Iraq to get grips on the important Oil resources in explosive Middle-East region.

    First you need chaos to happen, Bush didn't engage in the Israeli conflict to finish the deal on the table set up by Bill Clinton well into Januari 2001.

    Bush&Co were aware of a possible attack, but wrongly estimated it would be able to manage the damage. What the Cabal didn't calculate in was utter gravity of the attack and the devastation with great loss of life.

    The frozen moment of Bush in Florida has always intrigued me, trying to interpret his inaction. Could it have been an unfolding scenario of the expected attack. Upon hearing the extent of a multiple plane attack, he scared off to a secret location at an AF base in Nebraska, leaving the nation at a moment of siege.

    My past diary was a search for the rationale, I knew the truth would never come forward by an incomplete report of the 9-11 commission.

    The title of my diary:
    9/11 was pre-emptive strike on US  

    Prelude to 9/11 attack on United States - a plan by Russia, Iran and India to strike Taliban regime in Afghanistan. The Massoud connection in Panjsher valley is important to India and Kashmir.

    My hypothesis: the attack on NY and Washington was a pre-emptive strike by the Taliban and al-Qaida!

    In the post-war scenario unfolding, see who got the appointments as ambassador in Bagdad and Kabul, a torture expert and an oil man respectively.

    I was still working on an addition, but the truth may be unfolding quicker. The management of the Lie House are showing cracks at last.

    In 2005 - Be liberal: Support our Allies of Democracy on Human Rights, the Environment, Gay and Minority Rights & EU and UN Third World Development Programs & Our Friends

    •  Pearl Harbor (4.00)
      The neo-cons said in 1998 they needed a Pearl Harbor style attack on the U.S. to attain their goals.

      Wake up, Watson. The game is afoot! -- Sherlock Holmes. (The sig is changed in honor of the great work done by Kossacks in the Gannon-Plame investigation.)

      by Carnacki on Thu Feb 10, 2005 at 07:50:51 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Excuse me but, (4.00)
        those fuckers.  Of course they just let it happen.  Where was NORAD?  They could be up in the air in 10 minutes for Payne Stewart's plane but not for an attack on the country?  It's always smelled bad.

        Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act. - Orwell

        by TracieLynn on Thu Feb 10, 2005 at 08:29:45 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  Who said this and where? (4.00)
        Sorry, but again, I can't wrap  my brain around the fact that they really would have allowed this to happen.

        If they are that power-hungry to sacrifice 3000 plus innocents, then my God, what monsters has America created?

        "Our particular principles of religion are a subject of accountability to God alone."--Thomas Jefferson

        by hopesprings on Thu Feb 10, 2005 at 10:39:00 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  oops I misposted above (none)
          Look in above  post for the link to the document. Do a search within the document to find the reference.

          "Not all who wander are lost"

          by mysticl on Thu Feb 10, 2005 at 11:41:21 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  I'm turning into a real pariah on this subject... (none)
          but the PNAC report "Rebuilding America's Defenses." that references Pearl Harbor is not the smoking gun that alot of people claim it to be.

          If you look at the actual quote, which I am too lazy to google, the authors actually said that any transformation of the military was likely to be slow, in the absence of a catastrophic "new Pearl Harbor".

          They didn't say they "needed" a new Pearl Harbor, or that an attack on the US would be desirable in any way.  It doesn't mean they didn't think this way, but it's a far cry from cunclusive evidence.

          "If immortality is found in the absence of time rather than infinite stretches of time, then those who live in the present live forever."

          by WAmod on Fri Feb 11, 2005 at 10:37:49 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  June 27, 2001 -- News Item in Israeli Pers (none)
          READ MY DIARY -- published in december.
          Chareidi Shema Yisrael
          Is Bin Laden Planning New Attacks Soon?

          June 27, 2001 by Yated Ne'eman Staff -- The London-based Arabic satellite channel Middle East Broadcasting Corp. reported that followers of bin Laden, based in Afghanistan, were planning an attack on American and Israeli "interests" within the next few weeks.

          In 2005 - Be liberal: Support our Allies of Democracy on Human Rights, the Environment, Gay and Minority Rights & EU and UN Third World Development Programs & Our Friends

    •  New pearl harbor (4.00)
      This PDF document refers to the need for a new pearl harbor it's mentioned twice. The first time on page 63. I believe this is where the quote comes from but I cannot verify that at this time.

      Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century  A Report of the Project for the New American Century September 2000

      "Not all who wander are lost"

      by mysticl on Thu Feb 10, 2005 at 11:38:18 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (129)
  • Community (60)
  • Memorial Day (31)
  • Culture (23)
  • Environment (22)
  • Law (20)
  • Civil Rights (20)
  • Science (20)
  • Rescued (20)
  • Labor (18)
  • Education (17)
  • Elections (17)
  • Media (17)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (16)
  • Marriage Equality (16)
  • Economy (15)
  • Republicans (14)
  • Ireland (14)
  • Racism (13)
  • Josh Duggar (13)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site