Skip to main content

View Diary: All aboard with hi-speed rail in America! (314 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Not in the northeast (0+ / 0-)

    Those empty subdivisions are in the sun belt.  The northeast corridor is high-priced land.  Homes are down to $500k in some areas, but not the costly ones.  An are of land costs a million dollars or more in many suburban towns, not to mention the cities.

    So sure, cheap RoW can be had from Detroit to Las Vegas, but that's not where rail makes much sense.

    Eminent domain is thus very costly. It also would be VERY unpopular, as thousands of homes would be leveled, and thousands more put adjacent to trackage. That's much harder to pull off now than it was in the 1950s.

    •  Ever hear of TUNNELS? (0+ / 0-)

      I mean, geez people, use your grey matter!

      An honest man in politics shines more there than he would elsewhere - Mark Twain.

      by AreDeutz on Sat Nov 20, 2010 at 01:50:10 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  For 400 miles? (0+ / 0-)

        Oh yeah, we spent $15B to tunnel under 2 miles of Boston, so why not 400 miles?

        Underground construction is expensive, and there's no record of high-speed trains going for long distances through tunnels.  The aerodynamics could be, uh, interesting.  150 MPH in a confined space, sure.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site