Skip to main content

View Diary: Compromise? "I reject the word." (201 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Nope (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    but I suggest you check your sycometer. You clearly advocate for a president that proposed a tax increase for those making under $20,000. He did this by agreeing to the $259 tax liability while also agreeing to end the $400 Making Work Pay credit. Net result?



    $400-$258= +142

    When you, as a Dem, continue to support a man who negotiates raising taxes on those making under $20,000 you are a sycophant.

    •  I'm not advocating for him. (0+ / 0-)

      I'm calling bullshit on someone using a Faux News, Red State, Glenn Beck, wingut, troll term for him.

      "If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there...could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated." - 1984

      by Bulldawg on Tue Dec 14, 2010 at 06:15:06 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  No BullDawg (0+ / 0-)

        You're deal is to operate as patrol dog, doling out HRs to anyone with the temerity to note how rotten ROTTEN Obama and his erstwhile supporters (enablers, remember the term?) have been in actually advancing a Democratic platform. You HR'd me for the offense of writing exactly this:

        I'm not lying...
        but the truth does hurt:

        In order of your points:

        The Environmental Protection Agency this week delayed two major clean air regulations aimed at curbing ozone and toxic air pollution from industrial boilers. The Obama administration denies that politics are in play, but that appearance is hard to avoid as House Republicans prepare to use their majority to try and rollback EPA standards.

        Read more:

        Habeas Corpus:

        ...But the Obama administration was undeterred by this loss.  They quickly appealed Judge Bates' ruling.  As the NYT put it about that appeal:  "The decision signaled that the administration was not backing down in its effort to maintain the power to imprison terrorism suspects for extended periods without judicial oversight."  Today, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals adopted the Bush/Obama position, holding that even detainees abducted outside of Afghanistan and then shipped to Bagram have no right to contest the legitimacy of their detention in a U.S. federal court, because Boumediene does not apply to prisons located within war zones (such as Afghanistan).

        Afghanistan has been 'geared up' as the new war, to replace the old war (which still has thousands of troops) in Iraq.

        I notice that you don't even bother to defend the massive tax cut for billionaires or the cat food commission. Either of which would be sufficient to get his ass primaried.

        You enablers are lousy at your job, which is presumably to defend this administration's abysmal policies at the cost of your intellectual integrity and conscience.

        You see a Fox News term for Obama in there?

        No, you didn't.

        You want to know why I'm going to make sure Obama is primaried? Because of people who ACT like you BullDawg. They are no better--and YOU are no better than some silly low level party apparatchik taking orders from the Central Committee.

        If Obama knew what his sycophantic supporters were up to, I bet he'd be embarassed. And if he wasn't, that's just one more reason to make sure he gets primaried.

        90% tax on all income over a million or more: a simple solution to funding Healthcare Reform, extending Social Security benefits and other budgetary concerns.

        by DelicateMonster on Tue Dec 14, 2010 at 08:10:52 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Dude, (0+ / 0-)

          You have got anger management problems.  AND a vivid imagination.

          "If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there...could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated." - 1984

          by Bulldawg on Wed Dec 15, 2010 at 06:27:42 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site