Skip to main content

View Diary: The myth of the Nazis (545 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Are they just doing it to attract attention? (0+ / 0-)

    is my question.

    They have certainly succeeded, and gotten people to jump all over the diary without reading it. Certainly the insistence that the Holocaust, especially the Jewish Holocaust, was unique and sui generis in history is counterproductive to preventing more genocide, but the insistence that it was uniquely Western, as the diarist also claims, is used by others, most importantly Muslims, to deny not only their own prejudice but their own history of anti-Semitism.

    I smell an ulterior motive in this diary, but I'm not sure what it is.

    •  I disagree with you in part, agree in part (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Danjuma

      I think that anyone who goes through events like that as a group have a common experience that they all have a right to share. Its not about attention. Its bout the emotional connection that naturally comes from the horor of having to go through that. It is passed down because everyone you know has been somehow a part of it. Its natural. Its about on some level truly not wanting it to happen again for many. Over time, that connection of the reasons why the stories are told is lost and what's left becomes less about the lessons of history. And on that level is where we meet again

      As for other groups- yes, the diarist is wrong, but also its a bit complicated as far as history goes given the far flung reach of the west, but then ther eare other examples that would make it clear its about human nature and limited resources rather than the west.

      •  I meant the diarist when I said "they" (0+ / 0-)

        I'm not going to guess at gender, and don't pay that much attention to it anyway. I meant that the diarist had attempted to get attention by writing the most provocative diary they could imagine, and had certainly succeeded. I think everyone on D-Kos at this hour has had at least one button pushed. Many several.

        As for you final point, I agree. Western civilization is just the most recently successful of many that have shown the human propensity for violence, especially against anyone seen as an "other" in competition.

    •  All that I read in relation to that was that he (0+ / 0-)

      was supportive of Muslims' statements that Europe was responsible for the holocaust and not Muslims.
      He didn't deny anti-Semitism in the Islamic world. He did suggest that current Islamic resistance to Israel is based on its identity as a Western colonial outpost, not on its Jewishness.
      We know that all sides use religious differences to "inflame the masses."

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site