Skip to main content

View Diary: Tea Party's 'States' Rights' Constitutional Amendment (189 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  DC statehood? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fhcec, Litvak1936

    What are you smoking?

    I'd be thrilled to see them get a vote in Congress, within the lifetime of Eleanor Holmes Norton.

    The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

    by sidnora on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 07:46:45 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  They can't, (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mollyd, sidnora

      not without amending the Constitution.

      Which won't happen.

      Hell, it required an amendment just to give DC Presidential Electors, and given the typical margins in the Electoral College, that doesn't take much power away from the States.

      Giving them representation in Congress is a much bigger chunk of power... which is why it will never happen.

      You'd be better off trying to restrict the boundaries of the District to those places where the Federal Government actually is, since the basic idea was that the Federal Government could not vote for itself. Put the places where people actually live into Virginia and Maryland, where they could be represented in the existing way. It might (or might not) be any "fairer", but it'd at least be possible.


      "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." -- Emiliano Zapata Salazar
      "Dissent is patriotic. Blind obedience is treason." --me

      by Leftie Gunner on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 08:37:30 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site