Skip to main content

View Diary: Clarence Thomas offers "implausible" excuse for false disclosure reports spanning 13 years (223 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  But (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    PinHole

    that's what I'm saying (maybe should have worded it differently).

    If he did nothing wrong, why amend it?

    I understand the difference between the requirement of name of employee and actual income. Come on.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site