Skip to main content

View Diary: Illinois Supreme Court puts Rahm Emanuel back on ballot (371 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  But that's how it will be interpreted... (0+ / 0-)

    ...say we take your original scenario, and instead of an apartment, Rahm has an agreement with his renter to allow him to use the guest room contingent upon his informing the renter that he will be in town. Then he is using his primary residence, and by that very technicality, he would probably be eligble in the eyes of the Appellate Court. I agree that it was a technicality that the majority ruled on.

    Or maybe not. I'm not second-guessing either them or the State Supremes. I just consider the requirement for City employees: you gotta live in the City to be one! And I don't like the idea of Rahm Emanuel being Mayor. Thank Ceiling Cat we will be moved out of here in 2 years!

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Tue Jan 25, 2011 at 11:49:12 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site