Skip to main content

View Diary: Gay facts and fantasies in Propagannon research (340 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Considering that the primary definition (none)
    of "intercourse" is simply something to the effect of "dealings or communications between persons or groups", maybe it was originally intended in that sense, but then some lugheads totally misconstrued it and actively applied the other sense.

    Otherwise, maybe the ambiguity was intentional, leaving room for various interpretations (but that would be really strange, I'd think).

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site