Skip to main content

View Diary: What Governor Walker Is Really Threatening (216 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Start blaming Walker (6+ / 0-)

    for manufacturing the crises in the first place so he could use Unions as a scapegoat.

    This is why we should be completely seething mad.

     The Republicans did it again. They passed tax cuts without paying for them and now want to balance the budget off the backs of the workers. This is why we should be furious to the hilt.

     NO discussion of this issue should be had without bring up tax cuts that weren't paid for with the intention of breaking the backs of the unions.

     

    The governor called a special session of the legislature and signed two business tax breaks and a conservative health-care policy experiment that lowers overall tax revenues (among other things). The new legislation was not offset, and it helped turn a surplus into a deficit [see update at end of post]. As Brian Beutler writes, "public workers are being asked to pick up the tab for this agenda."

    ~a little change goes a long way~

    by missliberties on Sat Feb 19, 2011 at 12:33:31 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Blaming isn't going to get (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JVolvo, cameoanne, JesseCW

      anything done for the long-haul, though.

      Ever since Reagan and his wife's "Just say no" campaign, this country has been obsessed with what NOT to do rather than what to do.  We focus on trying to eliminate the negative rather than working to expand and strengthen the foundations of the positive.

      Democrats need to sell something rather than just playing defense all of the time.  But first they have to make the case - they have to talk about what's good - and explain why what's good is good.  If they don't start that narrative and go strong with it, we are going to continue to have to fight and probably lose these battles more often than not.

    •  Income transfer (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      missliberties, JVolvo

      from workers to business.  The damn Republicans say they hate "socialism" and income transfers funded by taxes, so call Walker's move what it REALLY is:  socialism for business, and an income transfer made by government action in which income was taken by force from workers and handed over to the tycoons.  If conservatives argue income transfer by force under cover of calling it "taxes" is wrong, then income transfer by force under cover of calling it a "reduction" in taxes to business is wrong.  They can only defend this move by saying they want no government at all--so who is going to pay for defense and defend us, or police us, or protect us from dangerous products or pave our streets, and on and on.  This is an indefensible move by any logic.  Tell the Republicans defending Walker to read the parable of the rich man taking the poor man's single lamb and having it for dinner--even their so-called god didn't support snatching the food off the worker's plate and handing it over to the fat, cigar chomping rich businessmen.  In fact, as I recall it, their Bible says the laborer is worthy of his hire, and to render to Caesar that which is Caesar's (this is, pay taxes to the state because the state has a RIGHT to collect taxes for the common good).

      When you lie down with Blue Dogs, you wake up with Teaparty fleas

      by monkeybrainpolitics on Sat Feb 19, 2011 at 01:14:29 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site