Skip to main content

View Diary: japan nuclear disaster: mothership (195 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Because solar is still too expensive and in many (0+ / 0-)

    places hydro is used to nearly full capacity and wind still doesn't produce enough. That's why we should be going full steam ahead with solar- as Obama has been saying for quite a while.

    You don't get to keep democracy unless you fight for it.

    by artebella on Tue Mar 15, 2011 at 09:35:24 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  You mean like winning the future by (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      doubling our renewable energy production by 2035.

      Sounds a little less than full steam ahead to me.

      But I agree with you that we should be hitting that hard.

      I'd say 100% of residential by 2020. That would be a great move.

      Democracy - 1 person 1 vote. Free Markets - More dollars more power.

      by k9disc on Tue Mar 15, 2011 at 09:59:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  "too expensive" is the excuse for failure (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      yoduuuh do or do not

      Solar is a hell of a lot cheaper than coal & oil (how much does global warming cost?  And how about the BP disaster?) and a hell of a lot cheaper than nuclear (how much is THIS disaster gonna cost?).

      Read pp. 1-7 of Krugman's _The Great Unraveling_ (available from Google Books). NOW.

      by neroden on Tue Mar 15, 2011 at 08:55:01 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Solar got only half the amount allocated for nukes (0+ / 0-)

        so that would indicate that the admin is more in favor of nukes. But that was then, things will be changing, no doubt about that.

        This above all: to thine own self be true...-WS

        by Agathena on Tue Mar 15, 2011 at 09:59:35 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site