Skip to main content

View Diary: MotherShip 10: Japan Nuclear Disaster (34 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  My understanding is that a fire in the spent (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, cotterperson

    fuel cooling ponds is a much greater risk than meltdown of the nuclear reactor core.

    Typically, spent fuel cooling ponds accumulate all the used fuel fuel since the reactors started.  In the US, this is because there is no approved of final repositories.

    A typical spent fuel pond can contain up to 20 to 50 curries of Cesium 137.  By comparison, the Chernobyl accident released "only" 6 million curies, which was about 40% of the core.


    The means is the ends in the process of becoming. - Mahatma Gandhi

    by HoundDog on Wed Mar 23, 2011 at 10:10:13 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site