Skip to main content

View Diary: Saturday Night Loser's Club, Vol. CCLX: "You're Fired!" Edition (34 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  how much a year does that work out to? (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dumbo, aoeu, jlms qkw, chingchongchinaman

    I'm guessing a fair chunk of change.

    BTW, I'm about to bail soon, so would you be up for watching for comments, mojoing and replying and such?  If not, no worries.

    •  Who is (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Dumbo, cfk, jlms qkw, chingchongchinaman

      "Friday Night at the Movies" ?
      sister/brother to CCCM ?

      "Drop the name-calling." Meteor Blades 2/4/11

      by indycam on Sat May 21, 2011 at 06:18:20 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  yes...ccc sometimes writes for that group (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Dumbo, jlms qkw, chingchongchinaman

        not sure why he used the signature this time....

        Join us at Bookflurries: Bookchat on Wednesday nights 8:00 PM EST

        by cfk on Sat May 21, 2011 at 06:26:33 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  'Friday Night at the Movies' is user rather than a (3+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          cfk, jlms qkw, chingchongchinaman

          group and that UID recced this diary. If it's CCC that's a pretty significant sockpuppet violation and I would suggest penitence. I see that is about two years old. If it was a group account and is meant to operate as a group than an appeal should be made to elfling and the UID can be converted to a group.

          •  I don't know, I guess (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            aoeu, jlms qkw, chingchongchinaman

            But there was a whole group that wrote that diary in DK3...

            Join us at Bookflurries: Bookchat on Wednesday nights 8:00 PM EST

            by cfk on Sat May 21, 2011 at 07:05:39 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  One of the main advantages of groups at DK4 (4+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              cfk, Dumbo, jlms qkw, chingchongchinaman

              is collaborative editing. A sticking point is that only one group member can be the founder. The founder then invites the rest of the group to become contributors and then when they accept the founder elevates them to editor or admin.

              I spent a lot of time beta testing so that the transition to DK4 would be as painless as possible for GUS. As it turns out GUS does not write collaboratively and is centered around the tag. Two groups exist but neither has any significance other than as place holders, really.

              I wrote four diaries on Feb 15 exploring the limits of groups and permissions. One of the primary reasons that we did not adopt the group format is that any editor can edit any group diary at any time without leaving a mark other than the edit. That requires a great deal of trust. One of these days a group is going to explode.

              •  well...Readers & Book Lovers seems to (4+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                aoeu, Dumbo, jlms qkw, chingchongchinaman

                be doing OK so far.  Limelite threatened to dump anyone who touched another person's diary without permission.

                I always check my diaries after they are published and I would notice anything that was different, I think.  

                I am sure the groups that did want to be able to work together on diaries are very grateful.

                I know I really appreciate the ability to send messages.

                Join us at Bookflurries: Bookchat on Wednesday nights 8:00 PM EST

                by cfk on Sat May 21, 2011 at 07:29:21 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site