Skip to main content

View Diary: Why Prosser needed EXACTLY +7500 votes.... (430 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Then pray tell, what was the point (0+ / 0-)

    of the OP?

    To tell about the threshold over who pays? Not much point to that diary. The "automatic" was the central point—not the sole one—but without which the diary didn't illuminate much.

    •  The diary didn't illuminate much? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Without that one word?

      Did you watch the Ed show? Did he waste a segment on this because he ommitted the word "automatic"?

      Did Rachel Maddow?

      You're right. There's no automatic recount. Good for you. But it doesn't make this rec list diary any less interesting.

      Is that it? Don't like the rec listed-ness of this diary? Is it that the one single piece--of-meta-crap diary you've written on this site didn't make the rec list?

      Even that doesn't give you the right to tell people to settle down, OR talk about my panties. There are half a dozen Kossacks authorized to write about my panties. You've not made that list.

      It rubs the loofah on its skin or else it gets the falafel again.

      by Fishgrease on Thu Apr 07, 2011 at 08:03:31 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site