Skip to main content

View Diary: Burners without Borders: Fukushima #53 (183 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  That's the first I've heard him (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Wee Mama, rja, peraspera, MackInTheBox

    He gets way too much mileage from simple assumptions for my taste. "The smoke from # 3's explosion was dark, ergo it contained plutonium."??? He fails to note the smoke from # 1 was just as dark.

    Improvement is change. Not all change is improvement.

    by ricklewsive on Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 01:36:22 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  he sensationalizes and speculates, but.... (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      peraspera, dnpvd0111, oldhippie

      Essentially he is saying three things:  "It blowed up real good" and "there are bits of fuel rods on the ground a mile away" and "these two events are related."  He's right on all three of those.  As for the rest, like he says, no one has yet confirmed or admitted that but it is a possibility...

      Who is this guy, and what is his credibility level?  I'm glad he is getting some views, he seems to be asking bold questions that deserve answers.    

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site