Skip to main content

View Diary: The one veto the New Hampshire legislature can't override (13 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  "the crap they vote for in their state legislature (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    freedapeople

    in 2008 gave my small, rural, non-diverse state marriage equality two years before New York got it.

    Also, undeclared (not registered R or D) voters may vote in the presidential primary, basically giving this contest away to Mittens.

    But pretending that's not true and going by the logic of your comment, a D would want NH to be as influential as possible, since the GOP base here has become so radicalized (resulting in what you see in Laura's diary) an R-only POTUS primary would give the prize to Bachmann or someone to the right of her.

    birch paper (mostly NH, mostly politics). On Twitter @deanbarker.

    by Dean Barker on Tue Jun 28, 2011 at 04:35:16 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Nice that they got one right. (0+ / 0-)

      Even if it was two years ago.

      But the fact that you think this makes up for the nonsense covered in the diary only goes to re-iterate my point: we don't need a New Hampshire "sniff" test for Presidential candidates.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (180)
  • Community (80)
  • Baltimore (76)
  • Bernie Sanders (57)
  • Civil Rights (44)
  • Freddie Gray (43)
  • Elections (35)
  • Hillary Clinton (32)
  • Culture (30)
  • Law (27)
  • Labor (26)
  • Racism (26)
  • 2016 (24)
  • Economy (23)
  • Media (23)
  • Education (23)
  • Politics (21)
  • Rescued (21)
  • Texas (20)
  • Barack Obama (19)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site