Skip to main content

View Diary: Prosser vs Bradley: Investigations Go Forth (211 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I am solely going upon multiple reports (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Justice Bradley, for example, has had multiple interactions with him that have driven her to be totally exasperated. She supposedly detailed these interactions in emails - and I believe that they happened.

    Here's a link to another person who talks about how disrespectfully he's behaved in the past while in the legislature.

    Here'sanother that describes the court as dysfunctional, partly as a result of Prosser's attitude.

    Bradley said Prosser's outbursts have occurred on and off over the years, but there has not been one of similar magnitude since the incident described in the e-mails.

    Prosser said he'd helped Abrahamson and Bradley in past campaigns but believed they were trying to get him off the court in the upcoming election. Bradley said she had not talked to Kloppenburg about her campaign, but did discuss the "pros and cons and realities" of a court campaign with others, including Marla Stephens.

    Stephens, the appellate director for the state Public Defender's Office, ran for the court but did not advance past last month's primary.

    Said Prosser: "There is not the slightest doubt that Ann wrote that e-mail to hurt me in this campaign - and here it is surfacing three weeks before the campaign."

    Bradley denied that. "I never intended that this would be public," she said. "I just wanted it to stop."

    She said she agreed to an interview in part because Prosser had been portrayed as even-keeled during the campaign.

    "You can say a lot of good things about David Prosser - and I do, and he is a good man - but you cannot accurately say he has a steady, even temperament," she said.

    That should get you started.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site