Skip to main content

View Diary: Paul Ryan accidentally admits GOP has been lying about its budget plan (65 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Education defunded? What? (0+ / 0-)
    They started defunding education 30 years ago

    Could you show me where education has been "defunded" in the last 30 years?

    •  Sure (6+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      lgmcp, millwood, TrueBlueDem, lyta, falina, IdaMena2
      State Funding Trends & Their Implications for Higher Education
      Many on CC have long warned that the funding trends in statehouses across the USA bode ill for the nation's public universities as fewer dollars are being stretched to cover an ever-expanding universe of students. While college attendance patterns are sharply higher, state funding has not kept pace with the likely result being comparatively weaker college environments for undergraduate students.

      I recently came across the report below and therein found many interesting and important charts and tables. Ones that particularly caught my eye and encapsulated the problems highlighted the change in state funding when measured on Full-time Enrollment (FTE) terms. Over the past five years, this number has declined by 7.7% for all states combined. For some of the major states often remarked here on CC, the results were:

      Educational Appropriations per FTE percent change by state, Fiscal 2002-2007 (Table 5)

      -24.9% Michigan
      -21.1% New Jersey
      -19.5% Illinois
      -19.2% Pennsylvania
      -18.3% Ohio
      -14.3% Virginia
      -13.4% Wisconsin
      -13.1% Maryland
      -12.7% California
      -8.1% Massachusetts

      -7.7% ALL USA

      -6.7% Florida
      -5.6% Georgia
      -4.2% North Carolina
      +2.4% Texas
      +4.0% New York
      +7.3% Indiana

      Generally, these funding trends follow the basic population and economic demographic shifts that we have been seeing over the past decade plus, ie, that the Sunbelt states are the beneficiaries and thus have more money available to commit to higher education. One big outlier to this is New York which has done very well with a 4% boost in its FTE spending.

      I think that the micro effect on an individual college varies significantly, but these trends are evidence of headwinds/tailwinds and should be noted in forecasting the future fortunes of America's public universities. At a minimum, public universities need to ramp up their fundraising to replace these dollars as relying on the politicians to solve the problem is likely a losing strategy.

      pdf source by way of cc

      This comment may not be reproduced or excerpted on other sites without my express written permission.

      by psilocynic on Wed Jul 27, 2011 at 09:34:35 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I am aware (0+ / 0-)

        that FTE formulas have reduced overall funding by the states  as you indicate. But a 7% decline (overall) is hardly "defunding" especially when you consider the outlandish increases in college budgets and accompanying tuition and fee hikes.

        fed funding for higher ed has increased as well (including en enormous increase from 02-06.

         And 2002-2011 isn't 30 years.

    •  Per-child spending was slashed in the Reagan years (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      millwood, lyta, falina, psilocynic

      and never recovered.  

      "The extinction of the human race will come from its inability to EMOTIONALLY comprehend the exponential function." -- Edward Teller

      by lgmcp on Wed Jul 27, 2011 at 09:37:56 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (148)
  • Community (68)
  • Elections (34)
  • Media (33)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (31)
  • Environment (30)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Culture (29)
  • Law (29)
  • Civil Rights (28)
  • Barack Obama (25)
  • Science (25)
  • Hillary Clinton (24)
  • Climate Change (23)
  • Republicans (23)
  • Labor (23)
  • Economy (20)
  • Marriage Equality (19)
  • Josh Duggar (19)
  • Jeb Bush (18)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site