This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

In case people have not yet seen it (I hadn't) Philip Shenon has a piece up on Richard Clarke at Daily Beast that is creating a great deal of buzz.  Titled An Explosive New 9/11 Charge, the subtitle to the piece reads like this:

In a new documentary, ex-national security aide Richard Clarke suggests the CIA tried to recruit 9/11 hijackers—then covered it up. Philip Shenon on George Tenet’s denial.
This allegation has, according to the story, been out there for a number of years.   Clarke was recording in a video some time ago ago, and when Daily Beast contacted him he stood by the allegation.  Tenet and two close aides vigorously deny the charge.

The heart of the charge goes like this:  

Clarke speculates – and readily admits he cannot prove -- that the CIA withheld the information because the agency had been trying to recruit the terrorists, while they were living in southern California under their own names, to work as CIA agents inside Al Qaeda. After the recruitment effort went sour, senior CIA officers continued to withhold the information from the White House for fear they would be accused of “malfeasance and misfeasance,” Clarke suggests.

Clarke said that if his theory is correct, Tenet and others would never admit to the truth today “even if you waterboarded them.”

Clarke believes that the only way the informationm about the two terrorists could have been so widely known within CIA without it being passed on to him in his capacity as overseer of all counterterrorism efforts would have been at the direction of George Tenet, whom in the past he had considered a close friend.

A bit more below the fold.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

I realize that this site has long prohibited conspiracy theories about 9-11.   In posting this I am doing so not because I am accusing the Bush administration of having done anything like ordering NORAD to stand down, or of having prior knowledge.   But an allegation by someone in Clarke's former position is worthy of some attention.  He brings, at least for now, credibility to this issue.  

It has always been puzzling how the two terrorists, who had left a monitored terrorist confab and been tracked into the US did not have information about them immediately turned over to the FBI, which had responsibility for counter-terrorism within the US.

As I recall, what made it even odder is that the two men, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, for a while stayed in California with a man who was an FBI informant, IIRC.   Had the FBI had their names . . . .

Let me close with what Clarke had to say about the two men.

He said that if he had known anything about Hazmi and Mihdhar even days before 9/11, he would have ordered an immediate manhunt to find them – and that it would have succeeded, possibly disrupting the 9/11 plot.

“We would have conducted a massive sweep,” he said. “We would have conducted it publicly. We would have found those assholes. There’s no doubt in my mind, even with only a week left. They were using credit cards in their own names. They were staying in the Charles Hotel in Harvard Square, for heaven’s sake.” He said that “those guys would have been arrested within 24 hours.”

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.