This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Disclaimer: I am a staunch supporter of the Big O.

I'm posting this question in search of interesting discussion. The recommended diaries right now have become amazingly stagnant, while I see an equally amazing group of obviously unelectables running against the President.

Surely I'm not the only person who sees that? Surely the Ultimate Independent, Michael Bloomberg, sees that, too?

Hasn't anyone noticed what Bloomberg has done recently -- the really admirable things he's done? Granted, I haven't dug below the surface when it comes to his record, but superficially, you gotta admit he's impressive. Think about that and the unelectability of the Republican crop. This country isn't crazy. This country ISN'T crazy! Those people ARE unelectable...right?


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Another thing you have to admit: Obama is doing what you want him to do (on his bus tour), although he's doing it HIS WAY and in his time. Sure, a lot of you who have been criticizing him are now asking, "What took you so long?" but just because he is an aggravatingly patient man who times things...just...so, that doesn't mean he is ignorant or naive. And you know that.

And I have to believe that if I know that and you know that, others know that, too. What comes with that knowledge? In the opposition, unless they ARE all truly crazy, that knowledge has to be accompanied by some concern. If you got one of them in a sound-proofed room and swore you'd never divulge a word of what they said, what would most Republicans (by my guess, 70% of them) say about their chances in 2012 and why? I think they'd say that if voters start listening, Republicans start losing...and they know voters WILL start listening, eventually, leaving only low turnout as Republicans' slim hope.

Given those facts, why wouldn't an independent with a solid track record of getting stuff done, of being wealthy yet extremely generous,  with an enormous track record of business acumen and governing experience coupled with an extremely successful straddling of the fence on just about every social, environmental and economic issue out there NOT SEE THE OPPORTUNITY Republicans have laid at his feet?

Unless I've missed something -- which isn't unlikely, I'll admit -- Michael Bloomberg should be thinking really, really hard right now. The only reason I can think of that he might not be would be because he supports Obama. I don't know if he does, but I wouldn't be surprised that he does. He's a reasonable man and Obama is far and away the only person in the upcoming campaign season with a track record of being reasonable.

Could someone else jump into the race, a primary-free independent with deep pockets and an Obama-like ability to get people to listen and think?

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.