This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Yesterday's Washington Post had an opinion piece by Marc Thiessen, "Harry Reid's Nuclear Blunder" where he criticizes Harry Reid's decision to change the Senate rules with a majority vote to stop the minority from forcing votes on amendments. Thiessen points out that this tactic could also be used to take away the minority's ability to filibuster. I just wish that Reid had done this back in 2009 when it could have made the difference between the weak tea Affordable Health Care Act that the Senate passed in 2010 and a robust law that would have included a public option or allowed medicare to be purchased by those under 65.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Better late than never. I don't know if it will make any difference because the House is determined not to pass anything that would be remotely helpful to the middle class or poor, but at least it demonstrates that the democrats have some backbone, a quality that will be more likely to help them than to hurt them in the 2012 elections.

Thiessen warns:

Republicans could now respond as Democrats threatened to in 2005 — by grinding the Senate to a halt on a range of issues and blocking unanimous consent on even routine matters.
Duh? Isn't that already happening by virtue of a republican controlled House that votes in lockstep to block pretty much anything? Am I missing something here? Is Congress passing some good legislation that I haven't noticed?

He goes on to explain:

Republicans need to pick up just four seats in 2012 to take back the Senate majority.
While Republicans are in a strong position to take control of the Senate, their odds of winning a 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority are remote. But now, thanks to Reid, they may not need 60 votes. Reid has established that the majority can ignore the rules in order to gag the minority and declare something dilatory by simple majority vote. This is a filibuster-busting precedent that a Republican majority could use to overcome Democratic opposition on any number of issues — from taxes and spending to revising the debt-limit deal, reversing defense spending cuts and even repealing Obamacare.
So, um, if Harry Reid hadn't taken this step, a potential republican majority would never consider using every possible option to overcome Democratic opposition? Yeah. Right.  
Extended (Optional)


Do you believe that a republican senatorial majority would:

15%5 votes
46%15 votes
37%12 votes

| 32 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.