This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I, among other kossacks, was chilled (to put it mildly) by the implications of Ralph Lopez' diary yesterday Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

Now today, in Politico, reporter Josh Gerstein has contributed a piece titled White House: No military detention for U.S. Citizens captured here.

Below the fold, please.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

American citizens who are captured in the United States and suspected of joining or aiding Al Qaeda should not be placed in military detention or sent to military trial, a top White House official said Friday.

In an interview with NPR, Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan said using the law of war, rather than civilian criminal courts, to detain a U.S. citizen captured in the U.S. would undermine the rights of Americans and the ability of the U.S. to urge other countries to respect the rule of law.

"It’s very troubling, in terms of picking up somebody here on U.S. soil," Brennan said. "When I go overseas and I talk to other governments, talking to them about making sure that they handle their cases appropriately and not throw people into military detention, not throw them into a military court, hold them indefinitely without due process of law. This is what has caused a lot of problems overseas. If we go down this road, we’re sending a very bad signal. We need to demonstrate, through the strength of our judicial system, that we can handle these issues, particularly on our soil, in a way that’s consistent to our commitment to the rule of law, but also works very effectively in terms of getting intelligence we need to keep this country safe."

"If we go down this road, we’re sending a very bad signal", he said.  Well duh!  Trashing the Fifth Amendment IS sending a very bad signal, back where I grew up.


Brennan's latest remarks are noteworthy because they go beyond the Statement of Administration Policy the White House issued last month threatening a veto of the NDAA. In addition, just a few hours before Brennan spoke, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney repeatedly refused to answer essentially the same question during a regular press briefing.

The White House's stance on U.S. citizen detention is likely to be hailed by civil liberties and human rights groups and denounced by proponents of greater use of law-of-war detention, such as Sens. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)

.     .

This is all literally making my head hurt.

I'm having trouble parsing this out.

I've gone to the ACLU website, and used their setup to email my senators to vote against NDAA.

Since I'm having trouble sorting out the news above, does anyone want to offer a take on these remarks from John Brennan?  Why would the press secretary refuse today to address these topics?

Extended (Optional)


Your Email has been sent.