This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Earlier I wrote The Myth of"Precision Bombing", where I concluded that the accuracy of modern aerial bombardment was primarily of benefit to the bombing power, in that it enormously reduced the number of aircraft and air crew who have to be risked to achieve a particular bombing objective.  It doesn't necessarily reduce non-combatant casualties, this is a function of the targeting decisions, which are frequently bad.  

On Wednesday, 12/28/2011, we saw this demonstrated in Turkey.  According to a Washington Post article published today (link) Turkish F-16 jets, using drone-based intelligence, bombed a group of Kurdish smugglers in the mountains near the Turkish border with Iraq.  Kurds are the dominant ethnic group here, and smuggling goods across the border, while illegal, is widely engaged in as a basic way of life, somewhat like moonshining in the United States.  Here's a video report:


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

And here is another more detailed video report from Al-Jazeera English:

For many years a rebel Kurdish movement has been fighting the Turks, the current dominant group in this movement is the Kurdistan Worker's Party (PKK), which the U.S. government, obligingly to the Turks, has classified as a terrorist group.  On Wednesday, the Turkish military, mistaking a group of smugglers for insurgents, bombed them and killed 35.  Just what led to this so-called "mistake" is unclear, but it is known that the United States recently deployed four Predator drones to Turkey to help put down the rebellion.

Today, 12/31/2011, a local Turkish official, district Governor, Naif Yavuz, showed up to apologize to the local people, who, not having received the memorandum about the wonderful precision of these drone-guided airstrikes, proceeded to beat him up and throw rocks at him.  A video showing the other-than-cordial reception accorded to the governor is below:

Meanwhile on 11/25/11, U.S. drone-guided or launched air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in the mountainous Afghan border region of that country.  On December 22, 2011 the U.S. government admitted this was a mistake (do ya think?).  As a result, Pakistan closed at least some Afghan/Pakistan border to NATO forces and it it has demanded that the U.S. suspend drone operations from a base in Pakistan.  

While the Pakistan incident might be attributable to lack of coordination between  the various military forces in the vicinity, the Turkish incident clearly was not.  And in Pakistan, even before the November 25 attack, the drone attacks in Pakistan were heavily criticized in Pakistan.  See this video report for some details:

Thus, one sees weakness of drone and drone-guided warfare, and that is that people won't long tolerate being bombed.  In the days of the internet and youtube, massacres (or "mistakes") can't be ignored.  If the point of warfare is to reduce the numbers of one's enemies, drone and drone-guided attacks on civilians, whether they are characterized as "mistakes" or not, are counterproductive, as they will actually increase the numbers of enemies.

But I don't expect there will be any drop off in drone warfare.  There is actually a Drone Caucus in Congress, and yes, these are the usual lackeys to the war industries.  There's a wonderful article on this over at Truthout.org link) where the author writes:

Formed in 2009 by McKeon, the Unmanned Systems Caucus (formerly called the UAV Caucus), aims to “educate members of Congress and the public on the strategic, tactical, and scientific value of unmanned systems; actively support further development and acquisition of more systems, and to more effectively engage the civilian aviation community on unmanned system use and safety.”  

The caucus states that it “works with the military, industry, the Department of Homeland Security, NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration, and other stakeholders to seek fair and equitable solutions to challenges created by UAV operations in the U.S. National Air Space.”  

Members include a collection of border hawks, immigration hardliners and leading congressional voices for the military contracting industry. These include Brian Bilbray (R-Calif.), who heads the House Immigration Reform Caucus; Candice Miller (R-Minn.), who heads the Homeland Security subcommittee that reviews the air and marine operations of DHS; Joe Wilson (R-SC); Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.); Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.); Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.); and Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.).  

The drone caucus works closely with the industry association AUVSI, which, in addition to the drone fair, sponsored a UAV Action Day on Capitol Hill last year.

Imagine that.  A "UAV Action Day" on Capitol Hill.  Let the bombing begin.

Extended (Optional)


Do you believe drone or drone-guided aerial attacks will result in fewer civilian casualties?

3%1 votes
0%0 votes
22%7 votes
74%23 votes

| 31 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.