This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

thats not that amazing to you but the last time I made one was November 2009. And I am still in the house and not under a bridge.
That's a good thing and I am thankful. So much talk about all the problems with the banking and the FHA and every entity involved (HAMP, EHLP) just mind boggling.
But for me on the ground, it's a good thing. Like I said, I have a home and for the immediate (two years) I have assistance through a government program to supplement my payment.
   I was out of work for a year and a half and I qualified for an assistance program that helps me make my payment, in full, to the bank each month for two years.
After that, it's up to me to figure it out.

And that's when it hit me that this is another bank bailout wrapped in homeowner bailout clothing.
Over the Orange Cloven Hoofprint


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

  The Emergency Homeowner Loan Program I qualified for takes into consideration what I am presently making, which is substantially less than what I was making previously, but it's work and we all say yay, it's a job, and supplements my contribution and pays the bank the full mortgage payment.
   So, the bank is getting paid, not only the back mortgage payments I owed from when I wasn't working, but, combined with my payment, the full payment they would have been entitled to under the original mortgage.
   Never mind that when I qualified a good interest rate was 5% and I didn't have sterling credit (divorce can tarnish a fico) so I got my loan at 5.25% and that's what the bank is getting paid back.
Just like the interest rates never plummeted, or that a refi would shave at least a full point off; the deal just goes on and the bank gets paid in full.

   I am not looking a gift horse in the mouth and once this all settles down, I fully plan to refinance and get it all lowered, but as a "keeper" of my tax dollars at work, I find it less than fiscally frugal that when the government agreed to bail out the homeowner, they didn't cut a deal and let the bank take some of the hit, but that's not how it was created and implemented. It was really a deal cut under the guise of homeowner saving (which it did) but behind the scenes, it bailed the bank out of foreclosing on a home in a dead market or taking a lower price. Essentially, the government paid paper value instead of actual value, that's something insurance companies won't even insure for anymore.
   It really was a bank driven deal that got them caught up, saved them foreclosing, gave the government some political cover and kept me out of the street.  It just seems like with a tiny bit of coordination, a deal of reduced debt, better interest rate could have been cut and everybody would have contributed to make us all winners.
   Instead, I win, though I am under a huge debt obligation that if I sneeze wrong or a kid gets sick and I incur medical bills etc that hiccups my finances and need to make a late payment it's deal's off- out and pay up. The government pays the full back debt owed, no negotiated amount to even the hit and goes on the hook for the full payment (plus my part).
   And it is such an elephant in the dark room with everybody having a different notion of what it looks like, the confusion and lack of coordination and communication is worthy of the Marx Brothers.

We shall see, how it all plays out; I have learned the ropes and I am just damn glad to get one more hugely stressful thing off my immediate plate.
Now, if I could just find a second job or other form of income to make it not quite so hand to mouth.
Hey, a guy can dream.

peace, y'all.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.