This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

During last night's Florida Republican debate, Mitt Romney dropped a bomb on unsuspecting audiences. He proposed 'self-deportation' as the solution to the issue of a broken immigration system.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The reactions to his statement were varied and even moderator Adam Smith asked him if 'self-deportation' was a "valid concept." People mocked Romney on Twitter, and the answer left people "intrigued, speechless, and confused (with some remote laughter in the background)." Even more dangerously, some viewed his stance as a softening on his previous hard-line, enforcement-heavy positions.

It should be clear that self-deportation is very real, it is happening right now, and it is a right-wing concept favored by restrictionist conservatives. What self-deportation means is making immigrants' lives so miserable, that they choose to leave. Adam Serwer did a great job of explaining the concept and its roots here.

A few points he makes:

[Self-deportation]is the right-wing's answer to the question of how you deport eleven million unauthorized immigrants: You don't. You force them to "deport themselves."[...] Romney and his top immigration advisers believe they can remove millions of people through heavy-handed enforcement that makes life for unauthorized immigrants intolerable.
The GOP pandering to anti-immigrant advocates is not going anywhere. When Mitt Romney boasts about being endorsed by known nativist Kris Kobach, and tries to mainstream euphemistic terms like self-deportation, the rhetoric is only heating up.

Make no mistake, this is signaling more attacks on immigrants with an escalation of punitive measures like the ones currently in place in Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, etc. Is enforcement through attrition how America wants to deal with this issue? Are we comfortable with looking back at this in the future and saying 'we harassed everyone out of the country'?

Self-deportation seems like a dangerous bet for civil liberties and because it will lead immigrants further into lawlessness. Serious conversations about solutions must be had, but the current political discourse is not conducive. The GOP is not naive, or out of touch about immigration, as some have described it. We are witnessing well-planned attacks on immigrants, and the current toxic debate on the issue is not accidental.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Brownmansburden on Tue Jan 24, 2012 at 07:31 AM PST.

Also republished by LatinoKos and Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.