This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

You Can't Read That! is a periodic roundup of news about banned and challenged books.

can't read_3

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

On the heels of the racially-motivated confiscation and banning of textbooks in Tucson schools (see my previous diary, Arizona Temperature Soars to Fahrenheit 451) comes SB 1467, a bill before the Arizona state legislature that will require teachers to limit their speech to language compliant with Federal Communications Commission regulations on what you can say on TV or radio.  It's generally being reported as a "no cussing in the classroom" bill.

No.  It's a book-banning bill.  If it passes, and if our conservative governor signs it, it will be used as legal cover to remove from schools all the books the right wing hates -- among them, The Catcher in the Rye, Slaughterhouse-5, The Grapes of Wrath, The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, To Kill a Mockingbird, Nickel and Dimed, probably even Huckleberry Finn -- books taught in advanced placement classes across Arizona; books young people actually check out from school libraries.

Something tells me SB 1467 is one of those American Legislative Exchange Council bills, written by right wing activists and passed on to conservative state-level lawmakers.  If I'm right, we can expect similar bills to emerge in other states.  I thought I was on to something when I began to see an organized, politically-driven pattern to parental school book challenges around the country, but as usual I'm way behind -- they're coming for the books through ALEC and the state legislatures now.

In other Arizona news:

"Arizona has made our books sacred documents now." -- Sherman Alexie
Local and national groups are working to make sure the Tucson school district's "disappeared" Mexican American studies books don't stay disappeared long:


Here's a interesting test for those of us who oppose book banning: remember those old racist textbooks that depicted early African hominids as dark-skinned and ape-like, while homo sapiens -- modern man -- always looked like happy Europeans marching off to work?  What would you do if you learned those books are not only still around but that your child had to use one in class?

A Tulsa, Oklahoma competition for budding romance writers welcomed entries in all categories -- paranormal, historical,  and contemporary -- so long as the romances were heterosexual.  Gay  romance stories, organizers explained, were “just too much.”  The competition has been cancelled.

Some New Hampshire conservatives have hit upon another effective way to ban dangerous books: defund and close public libraries.  Well, if that doesn't work, they can always consider the Arizona option!

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to pwoodford on Wed Feb 15, 2012 at 03:06 PM PST.

Also republished by Readers and Book Lovers and Progressive Friends of the Library Newsletter.

Your Email has been sent.