This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Rep. Paul Ryan
Rep. Paul Ryan's real plan: Seniors living in poverty (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
It's hard to read much of Rep. Paul Ryan's work, specifically commentary like this, and not conclude that he's sociopath.

In this commentary, Ryan goes back to the CBO study on income inequality and finds this to be horrified by:

Government transfers and federal taxes both help to even out the income distribution. Transfers boost income the most for lower-income households, while taxes claim a larger share of income as people's income rises.

In 2007, federal taxes and transfers reduced the dispersion of income by 20 percent, but that equalizing effect was larger in 1979. The share of transfer payments to the lowest-income households declined.

Here's how Ryan interprets that (a hint: he thinks it's a bad thing):
One underreported conclusion from the CBO study is that shifts in government transfer payments have contributed to increasing inequality over time. Government transfer payments remain progressive, of course, but the equalizing effect of transfers and taxes on household income was smaller in 2007 than it was in 1979.

This is mainly because the distribution of government transfers has moved away from lower-income households. For instance, in 1979, households in the lowest income quintile received 54 percent of all transfer payments. In 2007, those households received just 36 percent of transfers.

(Continue reading below the fold)

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Could it be, Rep. Ryan, that transfer payments like Social Security in particular are shifting away from lower-income households because there aren't as many lower income households? Because it works the way the CBO says, and "transfers boost income the most for lower-income households"? For example, here's this from the National Bureau of Economic Research on elderly poverty. Check out what's happened to the poverty rate among the elderly since 1979. The poverty is the darker line. The one that keeps falling as the other line, Social Security expenditures, rises.

elderly poverty
Ryan is using the shocking finding that the lowest quintile is receiving less in transfer payments (the lowest quintile being the lowest 20 percent of the population) to argue that the remaining 80 percent should be subject to means testing. He says, "There is something wrong with our government transfer programs if they are increasingly steering assistance to the wealthy."
This shift reflects a growth in programs that focus on the elderly population and are not for the most part income-adjusted, such as Social Security and Medicare. In other words, the structure of some of our largest entitlement programs has decreased the share of government transfer payments going to lower-income households and increased the share going to wealthier seniors.
In Ryan's world 80 percent of seniors are wealthy. That will be news to probably 75 percent of seniors. And they got that way because Social Security and Medicare have helped them out of poverty. So Social Security and Medicare have to be adjusted so that more seniors are forced into poverty. That, Ryan says, is "promoting the natural rights and the inherent dignity of the individual."
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Thu Mar 08, 2012 at 12:34 PM PST.

Also republished by Social Security Defenders, Daily Kos, and ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement.

Your Email has been sent.