You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
It took three years, but Spencer Ackerman's Freedom of Information Act request has finally put the 2006 torture memo he was seeking into his hands. The memo—which went contrary to the views expressed in a 2005 memo written by Steven Bradbury, head of the Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel—was written by State Department counselor Philip Zelikow. He warned that the so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" being used were against U.S. law, “even if there is a compelling state interest asserted to justify them.” Of an interview with Zelikow Wednesday, Ackerman writes:
Zelikow argued that the Geneva conventions applied to al-Qaida — a position neither the Justice Department nor the White House shared at the time. That made waterboarding and the like a violation of the War Crimes statute and a “felony,” Zelikow tells Danger Room. Asked explicitly if he believed the use of those interrogation techniques were a war crime, Zelikow replied, “Yes.” [...]
“We are unaware of any precedent in World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, or any subsequent conflict for authorized, systematic interrogation practices similar to those in question here,” Zelikow wrote, “even where the prisoners were presumed to be unlawful combatants.” [...]
“Coercive” interrogation methods “least likely to be sustained” by judges were “the waterboard, walling, dousing, stress positions, and cramped confinement,” Zelikow advised, “especially [when] viewed cumulatively.” (Most CIA torture regimens made use of multiple torture techniques.) “Those most likely to be sustained are the basic detention conditions and, in context, the corrective techniques, such as slaps.”
The Bush administration ignored Zelikow's warnings and last June, after a long inquiry, the Obama Department of Justice let almost all of it slide when it said no charges would be filed in 99 of 101 cases involving CIA torture of detainees. As Ackerman notes, the inquiry did not even investigate whether there was complicity in war crimes by the top Bush administration officials who put together the torture package and ordered it implemented.
“I don’t know why Mr. Durham came to the conclusions he did,” Zelikow says, referring to the Justice Department special prosecutor for the CIA torture inquiry, John Durham. “I’m not impugning them, I just literally don’t know why, because he never published any details about either the factual analysis or legal analysis that led to those conclusions.”
It's no surprise to anyone at this late date that the thugs who put together the torture program—and ran secret prisons around the world where they could carry it out like the good little totalitarians they are—will never pay a price for it. They write their memoirs and collect their speaking fees and continue to bask in the adulation of a hefty proportion of Americans who still think torture is no big deal and, even if it were, suspected terrorists deserve it. Others who say torture is a big deal but we have to move on are complicit not just in these crimes but also the ones that will inevitably occur in the future because nothing was done about these.
Marcy Wheeler, who has followed this and related issues extensively from the beginning, has additional discussion here.
Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Wed Apr 04, 2012 at 11:34 AM PDT.