This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Some strange things have gone generally unnoticed in the media thus far in the George Zimmerman case.

For example at today's First Appearance the journalists each received a copy of the charging Affidavit.  But what went unnoticed is that what appeared to be prominent information was blacked out or "redacted."

Who did it?  Why?  And was it legal?

It turns out that what was mysteriously censored were two key facts about the evidence in the case:

Zimmerman shot Martin in the Chest. When police arrived Zimmerman admitted shooting Martin.
Who left that out and why?

Maybe the answer lies in some questionable activities of some of these actors in withholding records contrary to the Sunshine Law.

See: Will Florida's Sunshine Law be Victim in George Zimmerman Prosecution?


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

For those who feel compelled to "read into" things "conspiracies" let me just make this point.

The point of the question of who and why and how was a redacted version given out to the press at the hearing [it is a fact - it was] was not to suggest they had some grand conspiracy.

But to raise the question of why were they attempting to withhold public records in the first place.


At 4:25 pm AP Reporter Tamara Lush emailed me, upon my request, a copy of the Affidavit that she had recently received at the Courthouse.  I could not be there to get a copy myself.  Prior to that she had tweeted that she had just scanned it into a pdf with a new app.  (That is why the "scan" looks like that.  It was scanned into a phone).

I immediately noticed the redaction and asked her if she knew who redacted it or why.

I then tweeted asking why there was a redaction.

I then obtained, shortly thereafter, an unredacted copy.  That is how I learned what had been originally redacted.

I provided her a copy of the unredacted version.

Later that afternoon I spoke with another reporter who was there and asked him whether he got a redacted copy.  He confirmed that.  I then provided him with an unredacted copy.  He tweeted to thank me (if you want to do the research you can find these tweets).

In between those two times I also made a public records request with someone in Corey's office asking for a copy and for them to provide me with a statutory basis for any exemption.  I have not heard back from them yet.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.