This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Peter Hoekstra ad features 'DebbieSpendItNOW'
Yeah, the Pete Hoekstra campaign
would never pander to racists. Silly us.
It's only the beginning of summer, so I can't imagine how nutty the "birther" conspiracy theorists are going to get by the time the actual election rolls around. Already, the Republican Party as a whole seems dedicated to the notion that there just is no conspiracy theory too ridiculous to be coddled—and why would they think otherwise, when their base has gone nuts? It's not like they have a choice.

So here's senate candidate Pete Hoekstra, simultaneously walking back and doubling down on his previous suggestion that something really ought to be done about this whole maybe the president is illegitimate after all thing. In political speak, we call that difficult-to-execute twofer Pulling a Romney:

"You would think that a country as great as ours could have a single person, maybe two, who every two years was assigned with the responsibility of making sure that people who run for office meet the minimum qualifications for that office so that we will never have this discussion again," Hoekstra said Wednesday during a candidate forum at the Mackinac Policy Conference.
I think we already have something better than that, though, in the vast national press corps (note: this is perhaps the only time I will praise the national press, and I am about to immediately disembowel that praise). Scandal is something they are quite good at! We have a lovely free-market solution to the problem of unauthorized candidate-being, which is that all across America, there are journalists who would sell their own mothers to get confirmation of a story like "a presidential nominee is secretly not an American after all!" And, as we can see, having scores of vetting reporters confirming that the current president's paperwork does, indeed, check out has done almost nothing to quell the suspicions of those people who really, really want to believe otherwise. Do we really think that having one or two government functionaries saying the same thing would "settle" a damn thing?

That's the doubling down part. But Hoekstra wants you to know, simultaneously, that he's very cranky at even having to talk about this:

The West Michigan Republican grew animated and loud as he defended remarks he made earlier this month at a Michigan tea party gathering, suggesting he would not have broached the topic if he had not been asked.

"This is an absolutely ludicrous discussion to be having four years after a presidential (election)," Hoekstra said at a near  shout. "It is an absolute waste of time and energy. We have trillion dollar deficits. We have eight percent unemployment. We have a health care system that is collapsing. And somebody is asking about the birthing issue?"

Don't look now, but I think he just called the tea party a bunch of dipshits.

Still, he points out the wonderful thing about birtherism: Of course it's a waste of time and energy, if you think about it logically. If the point is merely to pander to thinly veiled racist sentiments of Obama's otherness, however, thus satisfying a large percentage of the base who are convinced of Obama's supposed "radical" nature because of that supposed otherness, then it becomes a nice little campaign tool.

Despite Hoekstra's protestations, that's in fact exactly how he used it. In front of a tea party crowd of conspiracy theorists, he entertained their theory and suggested government ought to get right on that. In front of a slightly less embarrassing crowd, he denounced the same damn thing as a waste of time—while still suggesting government get right on that. That's the way the birther game is played.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.