This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

We get quite a dollop of polling on this Wednesday, and a couple of House polls have to be seen as optimistic news for Democrats. Democrats lead a sitting Republican incumbent (albeit one long thought vulnerable, hold a narrow edge in another race that looked somewhat problematic after the June primaries in California, and they hold a venerable Republican incumbent under 50 percent in another race that had been left off the target list for most in the pundit class.

Coupled with other recent polling, Democrats have to feel reasonably pleased that they have a puncher's chance at making gains, given that there is a fairly broad list of races that appear, at this point, to be competitive.

On to the numbers:


NATIONAL (Gallup Tracking): Romney d. Obama (46-45)

NATIONAL (Rasmussen Tracking): Romney d. Obama (47-44)

NATIONAL (YouGov): Romney d. Obama (45-44)

MICHIGAN (Mitchell Research): Romney d. Obama (45-44)

MICHIGAN (PPP): Obama d. Romney (53-39)

NEW YORK (Quinnipiac): Obama d. Romney (55-32)

PENNSYLVANIA (PPP): Obama d. Romney (49-43)

CA-26 (Tulchin Research for Brownley): Julia Brownley (D) 48, Tony Strickland (R) 44

FL-13 (DCCC IVR Polling): Rep. Bill Young (R) 49, Jessica Ehrlich (D) 35

MI-SEN (Rasmussen): Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D) 46, Pete Hoekstra (R) 40; Stabenow 47, Clark Durant (R) 39

MI-14—D (Foster McCollum White for Fox 2 News Detroit): Rep. Gary Peters 45, Rep. Hansen Clarke 27, Brenda Lawrence 10, Mary Waters 1, Bob Costello <1

NY-SEN (Quinnipiac): Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D) 57, Wendy Long (R) 24

NY-24 (Normington Petts for House Majority PAC): Dan Maffei (D) 44, Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (R) 40

NC-GOV (National Research for Civitas—R): Pat McCrory (R) 47, Walter Dalton (D) 37, Barbara Howe (L) 6

A few thoughts, as always, await you just past the jump...

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Now, let me caution against irrational exuberance—none of the House polls listed above are necessarily a surprise. It's tough to find anyone who thinks Ann Marie Buerkle is a betting favorite for re-election against the man she narrowly unseated in 2010—Democrat Dan Maffei. The district is blue, and today's statewide Q poll confirms that Buerkle is getting absolutely zero help at the top of the ticket. In fact, some might be surprised that Maffei is only up four on the GOP incumbent (though the sample composition, as it relates to 2008 presidential numbers, shows this to be a fairly favorable sample for the GOP).

Meanwhile, the newly drawn California 26th went pretty solidly for Barack Obama in 2008, which would also make it less than headline news that the Democratic nominee in the district has a lead. However, the June 6th open primaries were a bit of a buzzkill for Democrats statewide, and the 26th was no exception. Republican Tony Strickland nabbed 44 percent of the vote, versus just 27 percent for Democrat Julia Brownley. If you buy stock in this Tulchin Research poll (and this is, surely, plausible), supporters of moderate GOPer-turned-Indie candidate Linda Parks (who snagged 18 percent) are turning primarily to Brownley.

Finally, the DCCC clearly wants to make the case that longtime veteran Republican Rep. Bill Young can be had in the newly-configured Florida 13th. Even though Young has a sizable lead in the DCCC's own polling (with a 14-point edge), it is worth noting that among "strong" or committed voters in the race, the Young lead dips to six points (36-30). It is also worth noting that Ehrlich is still comparably unknown.

On balance, not a bad polling day for the blue team downballot.

In other polling news...

  • The polling at the top of the ballot, on the other hand, is pretty lousy for the Democrats. It is the first time in a very long time that Mitt Romney has led in three separate polling samples released on the same day (albeit by infinitesimal margins), although all three pollsters have given Romney leads in the not-too-distant past.

    Also, a Mitchell Research poll in Michigan claims a dead heat in the state, with Mitt Romney staked to a lead of a single point. However, that poll does have one curiosity. It gave the president solid leads of 5-10 points with younger voters (18-39, where Obama led by 10) and older voters (60+, where Obama led by 5). Where Romney forged his "lead" was with voters 40-59, where Romney enjoyed a 10-point lead. I haven't crunched the math, but that seems to assume a substantial share of the electorate will be 40-59 years of age, something that is not borne out by the 2008 exit polls. Plus, of course, PPP also polled the state this weekend, and found a dramatically different result. Rasmussen polled recently, as well, and essentially split the difference.

  • Ramussen keeps with a recent trend of note: presidential toplines that seem to hit close to the fairway, which are then coupled with downballot polls that make you scratch your head. They did this in Ohio a while back, when they implied that Barack Obama was running at almost identical margins as Sherrod Brown, a parallel performance that no other pollster had caught. They do it again here, with identical six-point margins for Barack Obama and Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow in their poll of Michigan. Again, every other pollster has had Stabenow in a better position than Obama. In some cases, that position was substantially better for Stabenow than it was for Obama in Michigan. Given PPP's huge margin for Obama in Michigan, however, I would not be shocked if they have them on parallel tracks, as well, when they drop their Senate poll in the coming days.
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Daily Kos Elections on Wed Jul 25, 2012 at 05:30 PM PDT.

Also republished by DKos Pennsylvania and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.