This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

My new book Einstein's Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion got reviewed in The New York Times.  

Gimbel is an engaging writer. In demonstrating the obvious, he takes readers on enlightening excursions through the nature of Judaism, Hegelian philosophy, wherever his curiosity leads.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The book starts with the Nazi-era claim that the theory of relativity is "Jewish science" and asks what that phrase means.  By examining several different interpretations, we are led through discussions of physics, sociology, psychology, the arts, history, theology, literature, and philosophy to see that the entanglement of science, politics, and religion did not begin with intelligent design and global warming.

Einstein was much more politically active than most people realize.  The wise, grey-haired kibitzer we tend to think of was a sharp-tonged, internationalist, anti-war advocate at a time when it was deeply unpopular to hold such views, much less express them loudly.  He was hated by German nationalists in the same way that Jane Fonda was during Vietnam and Michael Moore after 9/11.

His detractors were not all ideologically driven crazies with no background in science. In fact, two of the leading lights of the Aryan Physics Movement were Nobel laureates -- Philipp Lenard and Johannes Stark. Theirs are stories of scientists led to ideological extreme by circumstance, but who, in the end, did lend their credibility to this horrible movement.

Indeed, it has not stopped.  To this day, there is a strand of American conservatism that seeks to undermine the theory of relativity for political reasons using some of the same arguments that we saw back then.  Indeed, check out the Conservapedia pages on the theory of relativity if you want a sense.

We like to try to divorce science from the scientists and the times in which they live, but science affects and is effected by everything else that influences us.  It doesn't mean that we don't have objectively good reason to believe the conclusions in the end, but if we want to understand how we got to what we should believe, the stories are much more interesting than you will find in any textbook.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to SteveG on Sat Aug 04, 2012 at 04:57 AM PDT.

Also republished by Readers and Book Lovers.

Your Email has been sent.