This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

An editorial in today's Washington Post discusses the "garbage" that is Mitt Romney's budget plan.

First of all, they point out how simplistic--and unrealistic--Mitt's budget really is:  

(More below the squiggle)


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

FORMER GOVERNOR Mitt Romney, the presumed Republican nominee for president, promises to lower everyone’s income tax rate without reducing revenue.  This sounds terrific. Why didn’t we think of it sooner?  
(emphasis mine)

Yes, indeed, why didn't we think of it sooner?

What is Romney's "magical plan" to balance the budget?  

...Mr. Romney says that he can achieve this seemingly magical result by “broadening the base” for income tax collection. This, too, sounds great. In principle, everyone favors “broadening the base,” also known as closing loopholes...
Which loopholes would Romney close?  Since he's been campaigning untiringly to decrease the taxes on the wealthy "job creators" it doesn't sound like the rich folks loopholes are endangered.  As the editorial point out, in the big picture, the loopholes for the rich don't cost the government as much as the few loopholes that not only benefit the majority of the people, but that are vital for some's financial stability:  
"...tax breaks for employer-provided health insurance, which according to the Congressional Budget Office will cost $2 trillion over the next 10 years; for pension and retirement savings ($1.8 trillion); for mortgage interest ($1.6 trillion) and charitable giving ($600 billion). Mr. Romney hasn’t said which of these he would trim or by how much....

As noted a recent study by the Tax Policy Center and the Brookings Institution found that Romney's plan would help the rich and hurt the middle class.  Asked about that study, Romney promptly blurted:  

"...they reached a garbage conclusion...”
So, what are Romney's concrete budget proposals to pay for his proposed lowered tax rates? Maybe Romney doesn't want to talk about how he would pay for his tax cuts, because (like his tax returns, which he won't talk about because they are toxic) it would be politically inconvenient to disclose to the voters exactly who is going to have to pay for the tax cuts to the rich. To finance his tax cuts and still balance the budget he will have to make significant cuts, which will be unpopular with most voters; if he doesn't make those program and/or middle class tax deduction cuts, he won't balance the budget, which his own base and budget hawk colleagues won't accept.  No wonder he doesn't want to get specific, because:
In reality, his principles are mutually exclusive: You can’t simultaneously lower tax rates, take in as much money as before and protect the middle class...there’s certainly no politically popular way, to “broaden the base” enough to pay for Mr. Romney’s tax cuts. It’s reasonable to assume that his cuts would, as did President Bush’s, worsen the nation’s deficit...
Romney hasn't spelled out his plan or how he could possibly balance the budget without making serious cuts into programs and tax deductions benefiting the middle class and poor...
Until he’s willing to explain how he would avoid such a result, he has little standing to criticize Mr. Obama’s fiscal shortcomings.  
Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.