You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
The post-debate analysis offers a chance to see a severe problem with our media, which is its focus on who "won" a debate and how the debate will effect the presidential race, rather than focus on the issues being debated. For example,a headline piece from Politico.comdiscusses how Obama's apparent strategy of appearing calm and "presidential" backfired and allowed Romney to be more in control. The same is true of headline pieces from CNNand Reuters. Demeanor and ability to hold one's own in a debate are important leadership qualities but the media's obsessive focus on these diminish the opportunity for democratic debate. After a debate, citizens should be primarily talking about their impressions of the different candidate's policy proposals. If this were the case, a debate could be a catalyst for democratic participation, as citizens would become more informed about the issues.
We can see the effects of the second-tier status of policies and issues by looking at how misinformed voters are. For example, in a World Public Opinion survey of voters in the 2010 national elections, 40% thought TARP was initiated under Obama, not George W. Bush. Liberals had their own misinformation, believing that the US Chamber of Commerce was using large amounts of foreign money to fund campaigns. Worst of all, the study found that people were more misinformed if they watched more news.
This is not an issue of liberal vs. conservative news outlets, since the focus on style is across the board, from FOXto MSNBC. Democracy Now had a better focus by allowing 3rd party candidates to contrast their own views with Obama and Romney. The value of 3rd parties is open to debate, but at least the focus is on issues. I can't think of a better example of the need for alternative media such as Democracy Now or ZNet.