This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

A three-judge panel in Washington unanimously has given the green-light to a voter-ID law in South Carolina. But it won't take effect until 2013. Unlike other laws requiring voters to present a photo ID at the polls, South Carolina's is not so restrictive, the key reason the judges okayed it. The special panel comprised two federal district judges and one federal appeals court judge.

In a letter to South Carolina's attorney general's office last December, the U.S. Department of Justice had said that the law, known as Act R54, would exert a discriminatory hardship on African American voters because they are less likely to have the required photo identification than white voters are. Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was passed to defeat racist "Jim Crow" laws that barred blacks from voting, South Carolina must "pre-clear" any major voting-law changes with the DOJ.  

The department's refusal to pre-clear was based on the original South Carolina law passed in 2011. The law as it now stands is considerably different. A key element is that it allows a person without one of the allowable forms of photo ID to vote anyway if they sign an affidavit saying they are who they say. Judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote:

In short, Act R54 allows citizens with non-photo voter registration cards to still vote without a photo ID so long as they state the reason for not having obtained one; it expands the list of qualifying photo IDs that may be used to vote; and it makes it far easier to obtain a qualifying photo ID than it was under pre-existing law. Therefore, we conclude that the new South Carolina law does not have a discriminatory retrogressive effect, as compared to the benchmark of South Carolina’s pre-existing law. We also conclude that Act R54 was not enacted for a discriminatory purpose. Act R54 as interpreted thus satisfies Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, and we grant pre-clearance for South Carolina to implement Act R54 for future elections beginning with any elections in 2013. As explained below, however, given the short time left before the 2012 elections, and given the numerous steps necessary to properly implement the law —particularly the new “reasonable impediment” provision—and ensure that the law would not have discriminatory retrogressive effects on African-American voters in 2012,we do not grant pre-clearance for the 2012 elections.
In a concurring opinion, the two other judges in the case noted that the DOJ was right to step in when it did to block the law and that the pre-clearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act proved their efficacy by spurring South Carolina legislators to change their original proposal so that it could meet pre-clearance muster. Attorneys general in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, South Carolina, South Dakota and Texas have filed a brief in an Alabama case that challenges the constitutionality of Section 5.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Justice emailed an official response on the panel's ruling to The Wall Street Journal:

The Department of Justice is pleased that the court has denied preclearance of the South Carolina law for the 2012 elections. With regard to future elections, the Department welcomes the court’s agreement that South Carolina’s law required broad modifications in order to respond to the serious concerns raised by the Attorney General that the law as written would exclude minority voters. We also agree with the court’s observation that this shows the continuing need for Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The court’s preclearance of the law for future elections is expressly conditioned on South Carolina’s binding promise that all qualified voters without photo ID will still be allowed to vote without additional burden. If the law—as modified by South Carolina during the course of the trial—takes effect for future elections, the Attorney General intends to monitor its implementation closely to ensure compliance with the court’s order.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Wed Oct 10, 2012 at 01:13 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.