This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney pauses during a rally at Consol Energy's Research and Development facility outside Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania April 23, 2012. REUTERS/Jason Cohn
Mitt, you've had six months. You have an answer yet?
Here's a question for Mitt Romney: Do you support equal pay for women?

This should be an easy question to answer, and the correct answer is "yes." Because this is America, and also the 21st century, and what kind of asshole actually says women don't deserve equal pay for equal work? Oh yeah. Right. The Republican kind.

During Tuesday's debate, Romney was asked about equal pay. But he never answered the question. Instead, in what has become typical Romney fashion, he explained what women really care about, because he's such an expert:

I recognize that if you’re going to have women in the workforce that sometimes they need to be more flexible. My chief of staff, for instance, had two kids that were still in school. She said, I can’t be here until 7:00 p.m. or 8:00 p.m. at night; I need to be able to get home at 5:00 p.m. so I can be there for making dinner for my kids and being with them when they get home from school. So we said, fine, let’s have a flexible schedule so you can have hours that work for you.
There probably isn't a worker in America, man or woman, who wouldn't appreciate a flexible work schedule. Plenty of fathers would love to be home at night to care for their children. This is not exclusively a lady concern; it's a family concern. And not every woman in the workforce wants or needs flexibility so she can rush home to cook dinner. And you'd be hard-pressed to find a woman who would be content to have a 25 percent smaller paycheck as long as she can race right home after work to get in the kitchen.

But that's what Romney thinks is an answer to the question of equal pay: more cooking time.

Oh, it's not the only answer, of course. Romney said a "strong economy" is important too:

We’re going to have to have employers in the new economy, in the economy I’m going to bring to play, that are going to be so anxious to get good workers, they’re going to be anxious to hire women.
Right. In other words, there will be so many jobs under President Romney that employers will even be willing to maybe, just maybe, give some of them to lady workers. You know, after all the menfolk get their jobs first. Never mind that those lucky ladies will be paid less than their male colleagues. That doesn't concern Romney. Women will get paychecks, he says. Who cares if they're smaller because there's a built-in lady tax? Certainly not Romney.

(Continue reading below the fold)


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Romney also patted himself on the back for supposedly requesting a "binder full of women" he could hire while he was governor of Massachusetts. Turns out that story is just another lie, and "the percentage of senior-level appointed positions held by women actually declined throughout the Romney administration."

Not that having a binder full of women has anything to do with whether Romney believes those women deserve equal pay. That's a question he can't seem to answer,

In April, on the very day he rolled out his three-pronged strategy to woo women, his campaign was asked about his position on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. The answer? "We'll get back to you on that."

After an hour, the campaign decided Romney "supports pay equity and is not looking to change current law." Which is not much of an answer, considering Romney has spent his career promising not to change current law, only to then insist that of course he hates current law and will absolutely fight to change it if that's what conservatives want to hear him say. See, for example, the "settled" law of Roe v. Wade. See, for further example, everything else Romney has ever promised.

So promising not to undo current law doesn't answer the question of whether Romney supports equal pay. Especially when his party officially does not support it, and almost every Republican in the House and Senate voted against the Ledbetter Act, and have also opposed the Paycheck Fairness Act.

After the debate, Romney adviser Ed Gillespie said Romney "was opposed to it at the time" and would not have signed it. So while repealing it may not be part of his legislative agenda, just as he swore restricting abortion was not part of his legislative agenda, Romney opposes it, plain and simple.

So after all this time, after repeatedly being asked to say, once and for all, whether Romney supports equal pay and what he'd do to ensure equal pay for women, Romney still can't answer that question. And it's a very important question, one women have the right to know the answer to when they're deciding the next president. You know, when they're not busy filling binders and cooking dinner.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Kaili Joy Gray on Wed Oct 17, 2012 at 09:49 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos and Abortion.

Your Email has been sent.