This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

In any Presidential election, Ohio will always find itself in the center of the storm. Its hearty helping of electoral votes along with its perpetual swingy-ness makes it the ultimate prize among the make or break states. This year, conventional wisdom asserts that the path to victory must go through Ohio. But is Ohio really a must win?   For Mitt Romney, the answer is a definite yes: he needs Ohio (along with North Carolina, Florida, and Virginia) to have any shot at getting to 270. Even with such an impressive sweep of the toss-ups, Romney will need at least four more electoral votes from one of the remaining smaller swing states.

With a week to go, Ohio is President Obama’s to lose as polls continue to indicate a small yet consistent advantage among likely voters. Ohio may be Obama’s firewall, but unlike Mitt Romney, it is not his Waterloo. Obama could lose Ohio and all the other major swing states and still have a plausible yet narrow shot at re-election. Call them the salvation states: New Hampshire, Iowa, Colorado, and Nevada.  Assuming Obama holds his safe bets (and let’s not kid ourselves, Wisconsin is still safe), winning those four will keep him in the White House with 272 electoral-college votes.

It’s fun to play with electoral-college math like this (well, fun for nerds) but how realistic is this scenario really?  It would probably depend on how the President lost Ohio. If Obama loses by 2 or 3 points, it may signify a strong and unexpected shift in fortunes that likely will cost him at least one of the four. But, if we see a repeat of 2004, and the margin defeat in Ohio is razor thin, Obama may still carry all of the smaller swings.  Here’s how.

A shifting electorate that compromises Obama in Ohio may not be sufficient to topple him in the other four. Mitt Romney’s strategy relies almost entirely on winning over white voters, and if he wins Ohio, it will reflect unforeseen movement with that demographic.  In 2008, John McCain narrowly won the white vote in Ohio (despite losing Ohio overall), but got thumped by white voters in Iowa and New Hampshire.   What this suggests is that even if Romney successfully increases his lead among white voters in Ohio, it may not automatically translate into substantial gains in the Granite and Hawkeye States.   Romney could also face the same reduced enthusiasm with white voters in Nevada and Colorado (in addition to a sizable and unfavorable Hispanic voting bloc).  Nevada is clearly Obama’s strongest of the group (Nevada all but guarantee’s the President’s reelection should he win Ohio), while Colorado remains very tenuous for either candidate. But these four diverse states stand as the last chance for Obama should the unthinkable happen in Ohio.

The salvation strategy is no doubt unpalatable to both campaigns.  For Romney, it makes his Herculean task of getting to 270 just that much more difficult.  And though this math gives Obama a thousand times more breathing room than Gore or Kerry ever had, it leaves no room for error. As a political strategy, it is weak sauce, but like a backup parachute, it's worth the effort.  

I think that the Obama campaign is well aware of the value of their last-ditch safety net.  Hillary Clinton can certainly speak about Obama’s knack of accumulating small-state victories to balance out defeat in a bigger state. Ohio, Florida, and Virginia may dominate the last throes of campaigning, but it’s a guarantee that each of the salvation states will see a visit from Obama, Biden, or the First Lady more than once before voting day.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.