This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

It appears that about 85,000 voters who voted for Obama in Nevada cast no vote for the two main candidates in the Senate race, based on a review of the CNN vote totals with 93% reporting:  Barack Obama approx. 529,000; Shelley Berkley about 444,000.  

The number of such voters stands at 50,000 in Clark County alone.  (It's safe to assume that blank votes for President and cross-over votes for Dean Heller were negligible.)

What a shame. Shelley Berkley could have won going away.  In comparison, the number of non-Senate-voting Romney supporters was only 6000.

I'm glumly looking forward to an analysis of this race's cross-tabs.

Update: text edits in bold
(more after that cute little curly-Q thing)


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

5:33 PM PT: 100% reporting


Obama 529,005

Romney 462,607

Johnson (LIB) 10,908

None of these 5,753

Goode (IAP) 3,234

Total: 1,011,507

Berkley 444,513

Heller 456,640

Vanderbeeck (IAP) 48,558

None of these 44,907

Total 994,618

There were 16,000 more overall votes cast in the presidential contest than in the senate race.  In the senate race, 45,000 voted "none of these," and 49,000 voted for a third party.  

That's about 110,000 voters who chose not to vote for the two main parties in the senate race.  In contrast, for the presidential contest, only 5753 voted "none of these," and 14,142 voted for a third party.

Of the 85,000 Obama voters who did not vote for Shelley, it is clear that many voted for "none of these," and as many as 16,000 did not cast a vote for senator at all.

But how many Obama supporters would vote consciously for the Independent American Party (the party of Virgil Goode) instead of the Democrat Shelley Berkley??  Apparently at least about 22,000 of them.

It's hard to believe there are 45,000 partisan IAP voters who would vote for Vanderbeeck and yet not vote for Goode. In other words, those voters for Vandenbeeck were largely Obama voters.  

Why? Much of this result to me defies logic and indicates a significant issue of needed voter education.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.