This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Most everybody knows that President Obama got reelected by running up the score with minorities while losing white voters by 20 points.  That's great, but the Republicans (at least, the few who still reside in the real world) are now thinking they need to seriously compete for minority votes (Hispanics in particular) if they want to win elections in the future.

Probably true.  And I've seen some concern trolling from Democrats about what will happen if the GOP does start winning Hispanic votes.

But... Here's what people on the left (and right) aren't thinking about.  This all could just be a zero-sum game for the GOP.

The assumption seems to be that the GOP can just broaden its appeal to Hispanic voters while continuing to run up the score with white voters.  Yet anecdotal evidence suggests that that might not be the case.  Here in Texas, the Republicans ran a Hispanic candidate for the Senate.  (Ted Cruz.  You might have heard of him.)  There are no exit polls available, but we do know that in heavily Hispanic counties, Cruz did perform marginally better than Romney.  And that was with a Hispanic candidate who repeated the standard fare, race-baiting GOP immigration talking points -- imagine how he would have done if he actually made an effort to win Hispanic votes!

Yet, in the end, Cruz ran even with Romney in the entire state.  The obvious implication is that whatever extra support Cruz got with Hispanic voters was cancelled out among white voters.  (Though, an equally plausible explanation is that Democratic candidate Paul Sadler had more appeal to white Texans than Barack Obama.)

And that's the problem that the GOP has going forward.  What the concern trolls ignore is how much of the GOP's dominance with white voters is directly tied into race-baiting, immigrant bashing, and dog whistles that have been standard fare since at least Reagan.  The GOP can't embrace diversity to win Hispanic votes while bashing it to win white votes.

The GOP has backed itself into a corner here.  We know what the white vote looks like when their choice is between a GOP that's hostile to diversity and a Democratic Party that embraces it.  But what does it look like when the GOP embraces it, too?

And this is the case with other issues as well.  Some GOP commentators have suggested that abortion is now an albatross for the GOP.  But how do the pro-lifers vote if the GOP is also a pro-choice party?  How do the homophobes vote if the GOP embraces marriage equality?

That's what the concern trolls seem to forget: if the GOP wants to broaden its appeal, they may not be able to count on the loyalty of their current voters when they do.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.