This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Obama should strike this deal with Republicans:  Give up the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% and in return Democrats will agree to cut health care expenditures by 20-30%.

How can he do this?  By agreeing to modify Obamacare by putting in the "public option" which eliminates the useless insurance "middleman" and its 20-30% of the cost of health care.   Obama gets his tax revenue increases, and Obamacare is "modified" and improved by the public option, and its attendant savings.

And we -- the ones who voted for Obama -- will need to step up big time to put pressure on Congress to adopt the public option.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

To me this strategy seems perfect for Obama - it's that "jujitsu" strategy that, according to David Corn of Mother Jones, Obama actually used last year in the debt ceiling "compromise."


In "The Myth of the Obama Cave-In," Corn reveals how much of what was perceived as "caving" by the public and a lazy media was actually Obama achieving some much-needed stimulus then in return for a short extension of the Bush tax cuts, but that the situation now is far different.  The point he makes is that Obama has this ability to engineer a far more complex strategy than he is generally credited for.

So in this case, now, regarding the big "deal" Republicans are making that they will "agree" to increased revenues only if Obama agrees to "entitlement reforms" and "put Obamacare on the table"  -- I say Obama should agree -- Republicans have to accept increased taxes on the wealthy, and Obamacare can be "modified" and the costs to taxpayers of health care reform AKA Obamacare can be reduced by modifying Obamacare into "Americare -- the public option Medicare for All system many of us  would be happy to fight for.  

What other issue can Obama count on eliciting such rabid support from us, his base, which is what he has learned he needs to do to succeed.  

Why else the serious, sincere, and persistent effort by the campaign to morph into a post-campaign action arm?  I got the survey and didn't immediately respond and got a follow-up that pushed me into completing it.  I got the clear feeling that this was a serious sincere effort to keep the grassroots involved, not just a token "thanks for your support and give us your feedback for the round-file".

What say you Kossacks?

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.