This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Sen. Susan Collins is the latest cast member added to Washington D.C.'s kabuki production of the Most Transparent Power Grab for the Massachusetts Senate Seat Ever.

Senator Susan Collins of Maine met for some 95 minutes with Rice Wednesday morning to discuss the ambassador’s initial account of the deadly attack on the US consulate in Libya on Sept. 11.

Collins told reporters she has many lingering questions that remain unanswered.

Collins stopped short of saying she would try to block a nomination as some GOP senators have suggested.

She made clear that if Obama choses Democratic Sen. John Kerry instead of Rice that he would have an easy path to confirmation.


Sen. Collins has upped the ante on the coordinated attack on Susan Rice's character and professionalism.

“What troubles me so much is the Benghazi attack in many ways echoes the attacks on both embassies in 1998, when Susan Rice was head of the African region for our State Department,” Collins said. “In both cases, the ambassador begged for additional security.”

Collins said Rice told her “she was not involved directly in turning down the requests.”

“But surely,” Collins added, “given her position .. she had to be aware of the general threat assessment and the ambassadors' repeated requests for more security ... [h]er actions — and whether or not lessons were learned from the 1998 attacks on our embassies in Africa — are important questions.”

“I would need to get additional information before I could support her nomination” to be secretary of State, Collins concluded.


Sen. John McCain, Sen. Lindsey Graham and now Sen. Susan Collins all have nearly identical talking points about unanswered questions, which begs the question, why didn't any of you get those questions answered in 95 minutes?

Maybe you should either shorten the questions or shorten the pauses between questions, because it strains credibility that you would have more questions at this point, given all the time that you have collectively spent with Ambassador Rice.

Steve Benen breaks it down:

This whole long con has passed now into the realm of pure McCarthyism.

"We are significantly troubled by many of the answers that we got and some that we didn't get," said McCain, an Arizona Republican. "It is clear the information that [Rice] gave the American people was incorrect when she said it was a spontaneous demonstration triggered by a hateful video. It was not, and there was compelling evidence at the time that that was certainly not the case."

No details. Nothing specific. Just John McCain, being troubled, as he has been since the country declined to make him its president. What happened with Rice and the talking-points, and why it happened, has been explained at length by everyone closely involved in the episode, including David Petraeus, whose word once was gospel, before the episode of The General, His Wife, The Other Woman, The Other General, The Other Other Woman and The Lovesick Shirtless FBI guy erupted.

Read more: Susan Rice John McCain Meeting - What More Does John McCain Want From Susan Rice? - Esquire http://www.esquire.com/...

Stop the madness. You currently don't have the votes to stop Susan Rice and your objections have no foundation. You were elected to do the people's work. So do it and stop the palace intrigue and character assassination of Susan Rice, in order to gain John Kerry's vacated Senate seat.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.