This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

   Here we sit, somewhere near a fiscal cliff, or curb, I suppose it depends on where you sit in relation to the edge. Who actually cares about what, and who is just leveraging one component to get something done with another, hostage taking, the whole mirror dodge drill. I think the only thing the two Americas and their creditors agree on, is that it has to stop.

                                              After the rusty iron rococo cartouche


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

  What it seems like is tit-for-tat or a pensioner's dilemma game. It feels like that because no one seems really invested in the outcomes, and holding the players accountable is a long arduous process.

   Here is what I float as a way of herding the cats:

Take the leadership of each party and each committee, have them reduce their rhetoric to a position on each component of the fiscal cliff; entitlements, debt ceiling,  Bush tax rate expiration, other spending cuts, you don't want too many line items or positions but you don't want too few. You make an effort to match each side's list in a committee. Say the Democratic Party says no cuts to entitlements, and Boehner's boys say Ryan Plan. Then you give leadership the chance to counter other proposed items from the other side or negotiate them into an already existing line-item.

  Ultimately you come up with a list of issues that represent each side and give the other side a chance to counter. I admit some common sense and compromise is necessary to fashion such a simple ballot so the idea is unworkable.  Yet I move on to the fun part.

social security
tax cuts
debt ceiling


  It's all there. One position from each leadership about what ultimately will shape the deal. Now, however many issues you come up with, you multiply that by a number greater than 2. I am sure if this were a real idea, mathematicians, stat geeks, Nate Silver, and Political Science theorists on advanced voting systems could come up with a multiplier.

 Now you hand each representative a ballot and a number of votes to allot according to their priorities. The fun part is the ballots are public and transparent and over time give a fairly easy to understand statistical representation of what your congressperson is all about.

So if the GOP want to save tax cuts for the rich, and want it known they are pro job creator, they can load up, and blow off entitlements. Deficit hawks can load up too. But that is all they get out of the deal.

Careful, career oriented representatives will learn you can bring the same priorities to every fight.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.