This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

While the gun nuts are busy equating any attempt at better regulating firearms to an attempt to ban all guns, I have been busy pondering the most absurd reasons for folks to own firearms or an unnecessary type or amount of firearms.

Is it reasonable to want to be able to hunt? Sure. But do you want me to believe that it's necessary to have 30 bullets to kill 1 animal?

Is it reasonable to want to be able to defend yourself? Sure, but you don't need enough firepower to blow the ass off of a small country to do it. And it is worth considering that your guns that are intended for "defense" are more likely to result in your death or the death of your family members than to ever "defend" anyone or anything.

I don't really want to get into the folks that have guns because they think there will be an apocalypse or a world financial collapse or some other scenario resulting in the collapse of our civilization. If things are bad enough that everyone and their brother needs to walk around with an assault rifle then I think I would prefer not to survive the apocalypse.

Follow me across the jump for my new thoughts.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

But more to the point I have had a realization about another group of folks. Time and time again I hear a certain group of people say that the second amendment is intended to allow folks to protect themselves from the government. It is a shield from tyranny? Does anyone really believe that a scrappy band of angry old white men with assault rifles would stand a chance against the immense destructive power of the government? We are talking tanks, planes, drones, some of the best troops in the world- just to name a few of the government's assets. To call what would ensue a massacre of angry old white men would be too kind. Or would our law enforcement and intelligence agencies ever allow it to get that far? I doubt it.

They actually do believe that their firearm allows them to have a check on the government. Not through directly fighting to overthrow our tyrannical government as part of a well regulated militia...

These particular men are acquiring arsenals to support their assassination fantasies. In their head they play out this scenario over and over in which they save our country from tyranny by killing our president, by killing our elected officials because they disagree with the results of an election. The types of weapons that could be legally acquired via second amendment rights will never be powerful enough to result in the overthrow of our government, but these weapons are perfect for assassination. That is what their "second amendment protection from tyranny" and "second amendment remedies" have always been about.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Devsd on Wed Dec 19, 2012 at 02:08 PM PST.

Also republished by Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA).

Your Email has been sent.