OK

This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.

ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.

  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

In a story from Buzzfeed, Marco Rubio gives us some real teanuttery on the subject of climate change and why it is best to do absolutely nothing.

Host: President Obama in the inauguration dwelled, to the surprise of a lot of people, at great length on climate change. Talked about, you know, reducing carbon emissions, talked about global warming. There's a sense now that nothing can happen on the Hill. That anything he's going to have to do will be by Executive Action. And I wonder if that's true,  if there is anything in there that you can support.

Rubio: Well, the problem with it is this, that number one anything that we would do on that would have a real impact on our economy. But probably, if it's only us doing it, a very negligible impact on the environment. Ultimately, if you look at the developing countries, which are not developing countries anymore. China, India and others. They're now the largest polluters in the world, by far. I mean they're the ones that are now...so to the extent that that's what you are trying to get at, the United States is a country. It's not a planet. On the other hand, if we unilaterally impose these sorts of things on our economy, it would have a devastating impact on economics, depending on which measure it is we are talking about. And I think that's what's more than anything standing in the way of doing anything on this. There has to be a cost benefit analysis for every one of the principles that people are pushing on. And the benefit I think is difficult to justify when you realize that it's only us doing it. Nobody else is doing this. What are the measurable principles.

Host: Do you see global warming as a threat to Florida?

Rubio: Well, first of all, the climate's always changing. That's not the fundamental question. The fundamental question is whether man-made activity is what is contributing most to it. I understand that people say there is a significant scientific consensus on that issue, but I've actually seen reasonable debate on that principle. But beyond it, the secondary question is, is there anything government can do about that that will actually make a difference. In essence, we can pass a law that prohibits X, it has this dollar impact on our economy which is devastating. But what's the benefit of it. Will it have a direct impact on actually turning around these climate changes that we are trying to address. And that's where I think this whole thing breaks down. When you look at the cost benefit analysis...I think when you look at the cost benefit analysis being proposed, if you did all these things they're talking about, what impact would it really have on these changes that we're outlining. On the other hand, I can tell you the impact it would have on certain industries and on our economy. And that's where it falls apart.

Did you get all that? We shouldn't do squat to address the threat of climate change because China and India won't play along. We're just this itty bitty non-planet country and what we do or don't do will make no difference globally. Um, thanks for that scholarly observation Marco.

It doesn't take him long to get to the heart of his objections to trying to stop the planet from spiraling out of control. Money. Big corporate money.

On the other hand, if we unilaterally impose these sorts of things on our economy, it would have a devastating impact on economics, depending on which measure it is we are talking about. And I think that's what's more than anything standing in the way of doing anything on this.  
Then there is this nugget.
There has to be a cost benefit analysis for every one of the principles that people are pushing on. And the benefit I think is difficult to justify when you realize that it's only us doing it.
There is just a tiny little flaw in what he says there. He calls for a "cost benefit analysis" and then declares it unjustifiable before one is even produced. Teabaggers are an impatient sort.

And finally he gives his sucker punch, "The climate's always changing". He has heard reasonable debate and has walked away confident enough to blow off any concern about one of our most vulnerable states to the effects of climate change. Florida? Pshaw! It's sunny one minute, a little hurricane the next.

I'll tell you where all this falls apart, Rubio. It falls apart when the effects of climate change give your state a multi-billion dollar pounding or two the likes of Hurricane Sandy. It falls apart when states have to go to the very government people like you were so keen on drowning in a bathtub, hat in hand, asking for help to get through. And when this all comes to pass, you and your cost analysis benefits will be judged harshly.

I thought this guy was supposed to be a rising Republican star. From where I sit, he's barely an uninhabitable planet.

Intro

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.