You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Deficit scolds and hysterics who continue to demand that we must, must do something about all the olds soaking up too much Medicare money are unlikely to acknowledge this new reality, but since it comes from the CBO, some policymakers just might. See, it turns out that Medicare spending isn't wildly out of control. Projected spending on the program for the next decade is shrinking, dramatically. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Paul Van de Water explains:
Here’s some good news on the fiscal front: projected Medicare spending over the 2011-2020 period has fallen by more than $500 billion since late 2010 — based on a comparison of the latest Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections with those of August 2010.
That’s important to remember because it was in late 2010—and based on CBO’s August 2010 projections—when Fiscal Commission co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson issued their original budget proposal, calling for slightly more than $300 billion in Medicare spending cuts through 2020. The original Bowles-Simpson proposal is often considered an appropriate starting point in evaluating whether other deficit-reduction proposals should be viewed as responsible approaches to the deficit problem.
The Simpson-Bowles target hasn't just been met, but exceeded, without any benefits cuts or anyone's eligibility age being raised. These projections don't include deep cuts that are always looming until Congress enacts another stop gap "doc fix" to prevent those provider cuts (because Congress always does come up with the temporary fix) and also excludes potential sequestration cuts, since it's not clear as of yet whether those cuts will happen. But even without those cuts, spending on Medicare has slowed dramatically, far more dramatically than private health insurance. This could be because of the recession, and also because of the changes providers and health care systems are making to curb costs in advance of full implementation of the Affordable Care Act.
As Van de Water says, this doesn't mean that we don't still have a massive systemic health care system problem in this country. We still spend far more for far less than any other developed nation, and that's the primary problem for Medicare. Making it harder to get, take longer to get, or more expensive to get for some seniors—all the proposals currently en vogue among Very Serious People—isn't necessary and won't solve the larger problems we face in providing affordable quality health care.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 03:29 PM PST.