This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Among the ideas most thoroughly discredited by the U.S. invasion of Iraq was the notion of "preventive war" to avert supposed future threats. Now, as the nation approaches the 10th anniversary of that disaster, a bipartisan group of legislators isn't just seeking to commit the United States to another preventive war, this time against Iran. Their non-binding resolution advocates giving Israel the power to make that decision.

One day after the U.S. and five other powers concluded talks with Iran over its nuclear program, Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ) unveiled a new Congressional resolution in support of possible Israeli strikes against Tehran. Among other things, the resolution co-sponsored by 14 other Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL), Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), John Cornyn (R-TX) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY):

Urges that if Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense, the United States will stand with Israel and provide diplomatic, military, and economic support in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.
That's not all. Departing from President Obama's stated policy that the United States will "prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon," Senator Graham instead said America must "prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon capability."  That much lower threshold advocated by both Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney would require (or may already require) the destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities. And in Lindsey Graham's formula, if Israel believes it is "compelled to take military action in self-defense," Washington must come to its aid:
"The people who want to destroy Israel very much have us in their crosshairs, too. So our fates are tied together here...

Now, this resolution is not a declaration or authorization to use force. It is a statement that in the event that Israel acts in self-defense -this is not a green-light to Israel to do anything other than defend herself--if the Israeli people believe they have to act in self-defense against the existential threat of a nuclear capable Iran, we will be there."


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

To be sure, a nuclear Iran would alter the balance of power in the Middle East and likely trigger a regional arms race with Saudi Arabia and Egypt. But Israeli and American national security interests are not identical. For the United States, a "nuclear capable" and a "nuclear armed" Iran are two very different things. While President Obama apparently shares the Republicans' belief that a nuclear Tehran cannot be contained or deterred, that's a debate the American people must have. And that's a debate Americans must have before the United States finds itself fighting a regional conflict as a result of a new preventive war launched by Israel.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Jon Perr on Fri Mar 01, 2013 at 01:42 PM PST.

Also republished by Adalah — A Just Middle East.

Your Email has been sent.