This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

This is the kind of diary you can read as a plea for correction because I don't want to believe Obama really, truly f*cked up and handed the GOP exactly 98% of what they wanted.

It seems to me that President Obama got took, was had, walked into a huge, obvious trap when he proposed the sequester. And to the extent that it was Jack Lew's idea, isn't Lew a shining example of failing upwards?

Here's my reasoning: Obama knew who he was dealing with in the GOP and its leadership when he was negotiating over the GOP hostage taking also known as the debt ceiling. He knew they were unreasonable. He knew they were interested in making Obama a one term president.

But he also knew that the GOP is pro-austerity. So what does he hand them to get the debt ceiling issue resolved? Austerity on steroids. A sword of Damacles so horrible, so bad, he thought neither party would let it fall and the budget deal would get done. Seems he thought wrong.

I didn't need to hear from Rachel Maddow last night in her segment about how the GOP is now introducing legislation to only undo the parts of the sequester that the GOP doesn't like to think this, it's just part and parcel of what the GOP is known for doing. Still, for those of you who didn't see it, here's maddow's self-summation below the squiggle.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The sequestration cuts are now law. How hard is it to undo them? How hard is it to undo the ones the GOP likes (WIC, unemployment insurance, etc.)? Because we see what they are going to do about the ones they don't like (give the Pentagon an increase beyond what Obama -- or even the Pentagon -- wants). And to all those who say public pressure will lead to their undoing, how does that work for GOP representatives safe in their gerrymandered districts? I'd love to see a Democratic majority after 2014, but hasn't it been determined that gerrymandered districts will prevent that?

So how is this NOT the single biggest stumblef*ck of Obama's first term? How will it not define second term? How is listening to Lew's advice regarding the sequester not a huge mistake? Is it possible our confident, in charge president got hoisted on his own "let's be bipartisan" petard?  It sure feels that way to me. Even the title of Maddow's segment, "GOP caught in own foolish sequester trap", seems almost pollyanna-ish in retrospect. Should it read "Obama", instead? The GOP has moved from trying to defeat to trying to ruin and any of the citizenry that gets caught in between is shit out of luck.

Still, I'd love to be proven wrong. Have at it. And for those of you eager to jump on me for criticizing Obama, I'm not a troll, I've been here for years. It just seems that pointing this problem out about Obama is an emperor-has-no-clothes proposition.

For those who missed it, here's the entire segment from Maddow's show.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.