This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Rep Mike Simpson (R-ID) on WH cancelling tours: I think the administration is trying to make (the sequester) as ugly as possible.
House Republicans are steaming mad because the White House announced it is canceling White House tours:
Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, said he suspects the White House is engaging in an age-old political trick called the Washington Monument strategy — threatening to shut down popular services, such as the monument, unless budget cuts are reversed.

“It’s the old, ‘If you don’t [approve] this bond levy for the school district, we’re going to eliminate football,’” Simpson said. “I understand the strategy of the administration: They’re trying to make it as ugly as possible to put as much pressure as possible on Republicans to change their position. It’s just not going to happen.”

And why is canceling White House tours uglier than, say, the Secret Service layoffs and furloughs that the cancellation was designed to avoid? A House aide explains:
“Basically it creates a constituent relations nightmare,” said one House staffer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity and is not authorized to speak with the press.

“It’s incumbent on the members’ offices, not the White House, to call them and tell them one by one,” the aide added. “It’s probably like if you’re a high-end car dealer and you have a recall on your cars and you have to call all these people who paid 80 grand for their sports car and tell them there’s a fatal flaw.”

Clearly, this is one asshole who has no idea what a real nightmare is—a nightmare like losing your job. Canceling the tours may have allowed the Secret Service to avoid layoffs and furloughs, but presumably the cancellation impacted the jobs of non-security tour staff. They're the ones facing a real nightmare.

Also, that car analogy is awful, and as you'll see below the fold, it's not just because car dealers are way, way more popular than Congressional Republicans.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The other big problem with the analogy is this: Congressional Republicans are the reason the car has a fatal flaw. They aren't the victims here. Instead, they're whining about being forced to deal with a problem that they created.

Nonetheless, these lazy and selfish sacks of you-know-what are so freaked out about the possibility of calling their precious constituents political contributors with the news that White House tours have been canceled that they'd rather see somebody get laid off or furloughed—as long as they don't have to place the call breaking the news, of course.

And don't forget, this is just a microcosm of a larger pattern of malignant policy priorities with respect to the sequester from the GOP. As Jason Linkins writes in Huffington Post:

The pain of cancelling the White House tours is going to felt by a statistically negligible portion of the population, who will simply have to make do with any of the many thousands of other things to do in Washington in the meantime. On the other hand, the real pain of the sequestration is more likely going to come in the form of the 750,000 jobs that the Congressional Budget Office projects will be lost by year's end, if no deal is made.
Nonetheless, Republicans are up in arms. Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) whined that the public had been "banned" from the White House. Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) said it was "petty" and seemed "childish." Rep. Tom Graves (R-GA) described it as "an extreme consequence" of sequester (unlike those unextreme job losses, I guess). Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI) said canceling tours was "wrong." And Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-TX) even introduced legislation demanding the tours be reinstated.

But despite all their angst, I have a piece of good news for distraught House Republicans: There's a simple way for them to get their White House tours back. All they have to do is end the sequester. And you know what? There'll be a side benefit: hundreds of thousands of people won't lose their jobs and and the economy will grow faster.

Extended (Optional)


Your Email has been sent.