This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

President Barack Obama and House Republican Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) gesture while Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Cal.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) look on during a meeting of bipartisan leaders of the House and Senate.
That grand bargain just keeps on lurking out there on President Obama's agenda, but, as this New York Times story describes, he's got some roadblocks.

Democrats express the fact that they just aren't as down with it this time around, that they're left unimpressed with his negotiating ability in all of the past manufactured crises. He might not be able to rely on allies in Congress to support his efforts. But the biggest obstacle is of course the Republicans that he just keeps reaching out to, the guys on the other side of the table who aren't particularly honest brokers and whose demands keep escalating.

Mr. Obama has signaled a willingness to reduce cost-of-living increases for Social Security by using a less-generous measure of inflation. He has indicated openness to imposing means-testing on Medicare beneficiaries so that high-income retirees would pay more for their medical care, and he has put on the table $400 billion of cuts in Medicare over the next decade.

Republicans say they are looking for more, including two elements they discussed with the White House during failed talks in 2011: raising the eligibility age for Medicare and cutting federal costs for Medicaid.

White House officials said that those proposals were deeply flawed as a matter of policy and that they did not intend to submit any more offers until Republicans expressed some willingness to make tax revenue part of the equation.

At least the very bad idea of raising the Medicare eligibility age seems to have died and Medicaid seems safe, but the chained CPI for Social Security—no matter how unpopular and how harmful to seniors—is sticking around. As is the idea of making Medicare even more means-tested (wealthy seniors already pay more in premiums), a proposal that would only be symbolic in terms of revenue, but could seriously undermine the program politically. To find out why, go below the fold.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The problem, as Dean Baker points out, with making affluent seniors pay more is how you define affluent. If it's the same as for tax purposes, it's couples earning more than $450,000 a year. That's just 0.1 or 0.2 percent of the Medicare-aged population. You're not raising enough money with that proposal to make a damned bit of difference in the deficit. As Baker says, would only really save money if affluent is redefined to $50,000-$60,000 per year, a level to which even Republicans probably aren't willing to go.

The political downside of making Medicare even more expensive for wealthier people is that it makes Medicare more like a welfare program instead of the social insurance program it really is. That reduces public and political support for it. Which makes it easier to turn it into a privatized voucher program.

Social Security, which is not a deficit driver, and Medicare benefits should have never reached the bargaining table in deficit talks. They're only on the table because of outrageous and capricious Republican demands. If Medicare eligibility age could come off the table, so should the chained CPI and Medicare means-testing.

Tell President Obama to take Chained CPI off the table.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Mon Mar 11, 2013 at 10:17 AM PDT.

Also republished by Social Security Defenders and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.